Comparison of short-term clinical effects of three fixation methods in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
10.3760/cma.j.cn101721-20211123-000236
- VernacularTitle:前交叉韧带重建术应用股骨侧三种固定方式的近期临床效果比较
- Author:
Tian MA
1
;
Fei LIU
;
Xinmin WANG
Author Information
1. 承德医学院附属秦皇岛市第一医院骨科，秦皇岛 066000
- Keywords:
Anterior cruciate ligament injury;
Arthroscopy;
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction;
Femoral fixation
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2022;38(2):140-145
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the short-term clinical effects of absorbable cross nail, sheath compression nail and suspension fixation on the femoral side and sheath compression nail on the tibial side in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with autologous hamstring tendon.Methods:The clinical data of 373 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries treated with surgery in the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao Affiliated to Chengde Medical College from December 2008 to December 2018 were collected for a retrospective case-control study. There were 125 cases of absorbable cross nail (absorbable cross nail group), 112 cases of sheath compression nail (sheath compression nail group) and 136 cases of suspension fixation (suspension fixation group). The mean follow-up time was (13.96±1.42) months. The international knee documentation committee (IKDC) score and Lysholm score were used to score the patients, and the differences were statistically analyzed. The measurement data of normal distribution was represented by xˉ± s, and repeated measurement analysis of variance was used to compare the three groups in different time periods, and the operation time of the three groups of samples was compared by one-way analysis of variance. The counting data were compared by χ 2 test. Results:(1) There were no complications such as infection, adhesion, stiffness and neurovascular injury in the three groups at the last follow-up. (2) Comparison of preoperative and postoperative knee scores: Lysholm score: preoperative absorbable cross nail group (65.98±1.37), sheath compression nail group(66.13±2.13), suspension fixation group (65.76±1.55). Three months after operation, absorbable cross nail group (80.14±2.02), sheath compression nail group (79.70±1.98) and suspension fixation group (79.84±1.86). Twelve months after operation, there were (94.56±2.35) points in the absorbable cross nail group, (94.96±1.34) points in the sheath compression nail group and (94.40±3.15) points in the suspension fixation group.There was significant difference in the scores before and after operation in the same group ( Fintra-group=17 584.14, P<0.001), and there was no significant difference among the three groups ( Finter-group=2.65, P=0.072), There was no statistical significance in the trend of scores before and after operation in the three groups ( Finter-action=1.28, P=0.277). IKDC scores: Preoperative (62.02±1.43) in absorbable cross nail group, preoperative (61.95±0.82) in sheath compression nail group, preoperative (62.25±2.05) in the suspension fixation group. Three months after operation, absorbable cross nail group (77.99±2.18), sheath compression nail group (78.13±2.02) and suspension fixation group (77.97±2.24). Twelve months after operation, the absorbable cross nail group (92.68±3.21), the sheath compression nail group (93.25±2.04) and the suspension fixation group (92.96±3.11). There was significant difference in the scores before and after operation in the same group ( Fintra-group=18 338.15, P<0.001), and there was no significant difference among the three groups ( Finter-group=0.91, P=0.402), and there was no significant trend in the scores before and after operation in the three groups ( Finteraction=0.98, P=0.419). (3) Comparison of operation time: absorbable cross nail group (99.04±18.01) min, sheath compression nail group (112.88±19.79) min and suspension fixation group (83.81±16.69) min. there was significant difference among the three groups ( F=79.74, P<0.001). Further comparison between the three groups, the time of suspension fixation group was the shortest than the other two groups (all P<0.001). Conclusion:There is no significant difference in the short-term efficacy of ACLR with autologous hamstring tendon among the three groups, and there were no complications such as infection, adhesion, stiffness and neurovascular injury in the last follow-up. In terms of operation time, the suspension fixation group has the shortest time and is simple and easy to operate.
