Differences in microbiology and bacterial susceptibility between alcohol abuse and no alcohol abuse in intensive care unit patients
10.3760/cma.j.cn101721-20210929-000161
- VernacularTitle:酒精滥用与非酒精滥用的重症监护室患者微生物学感染指标及药敏结果的差异
- Author:
Daonan CHEN
1
;
Qi ZHAO
;
Yun XIE
;
Zhigang ZHOU
;
Ruilan WANG
;
Rui TIAN
Author Information
1. 上海交通大学附属第一人民医院急诊危重病科，上海 201620
- Keywords:
Alcohol abuse;
Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Ⅲ Database;
Pseudomonas aeruginosa;
Enterococcus sp.;
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aure
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2022;38(1):30-39
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the differences in microbiological examination results between alcohol abuse and no alcohol abuse in adult ICU patients and the association between alcohol abuse and these differences.Methods:The adult patients with microbiological examination results were selected from the MIMIC-Ⅲ database and divided into two groups according to whether they had alcohol abuse. The two groups were matched by propensity score, and the similarities and differences in microbiological examination results were evaluated between the two groups after matching. The measurement data of non normal distribution were expressed by M ( Q1, Q3). Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for the comparison of the two groups, and the comparison of counting data was used χ 2 test or Fisher exact probability method. Results:After matching, the alcohol abuse patients were more likely to use mechanical ventilation (47.06% (1 379/2 930) vs. 52.66% (1 543/2 930), χ 2=18.14, P<0.001), had a higher positive rate in sputum samples (44.30% (400/903) vs. 49.41% (501/1 014), χ 2=4.81, P=0.028) and had a lower positive rate in other samples (26.85% (653/2 432) vs. 21.67% (541/2 496), χ 2=17.69, P<0.001). In blood samples, the percentage of Gram-negative bacteria was lower in the alcohol abuse group (26.87% (126/469) vs. 17.25% (74/429), χ 2=11.42, P<0.001), while the percentage of Gram-positive bacteria was higher (78.46% (368/469) vs. 86.01% (369/429), χ 2=8.17, P=0.004). The percentage of patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.75% (110/2 930) vs. 2.08% (61/2 930), χ 2=13.88, P<0.001) and Enterococcus sp. (8.19% (240/2 930) vs. 6.45% (189/2 930), χ 2=6.29, P=0.012) was lower in the alcohol abuse group. However, there was a higher percentage of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (2.32% (68/2 930) vs. 3.28% (96/2 930), χ 2=4.57, P=0.032) and Haemophilus influenzae (1.30% (38/2 930) vs. 2.01% (59/2930), χ 2=4.19, P=0.041) in the alcohol abuse group. For Staphylococcus aureus (61.10% (322/527) and 52.66% (267/507), χ 2=7.16, P=0.007) and Enterococcus sp. (75.83% (160/211) and 63.64% (56/88), χ 2=4.02, P=0.045), the alcohol abuse group had a lower resistance to levofloxacin; for Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae, the alcohol abuse group had a lower resistance to cephalosporins (all P<0.05). Conclusions:In adult ICU, alcohol abuse might increase the risks of using mechanical ventilation, and patients with alcohol abuse might be more prone to have respiratory tract infections. Alcohol abuse patients with blood infections were less likely to be infected with Gram-negative bacteria, but had a higher probability of Gram-positive bacteria infection. What is more, Alcohol abuse might increase the risks of infections with Haemophilus influenzae and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In alcohol abuse patients, the infection of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus sp., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae was less resistant to many antibiotics than that in no alcohol abuse patients.
