Comparative analysis of different surgical methods for patients with moderate to severe uterine prolapse without conserving fertility
10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20210104-00007
- VernacularTitle:中重度子宫脱垂患者施行无保留生育功能不同手术方式的对比分析研究
- Author:
Xiaohan XU
1
;
Yan WEI
;
Rui BAI
;
Ping YANG
Author Information
1. 石河子大学医学院第一附属医院妇科 832008
- Keywords:
Uterine prolapse;
Abdominal transverse fascia suspension;
Transvaginal hysterectomy;
Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy;
Quality of life
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2021;23(12):1786-1790,1794
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the efficacy of three different surgical methods in the treatment of patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP)-Q grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ uterine prolapse (UP).Methods:The clinical data of 100 patients with pelvic organ prolapse quantitative (POP-Q) grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ UP treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Shihezi University from November 2015 to April 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the operation method, they were divided into vaginal total hysterectomy group (TVH group, n=46), laparoscopic total hysterectomy + vaginal stump Y-patch sacral fixation group (LSC group, n=34) and transabdominal total hysterectomy + vaginal stump abdominal transverse fascia and round ligament suspension group (AFS group, n=20). The age, body mass index, delivery times, operation time and intraoperative bleeding of the three groups were compared. POP-Q scale, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) were used to evaluate the objective cure, subjective satisfaction, preoperative and postoperative quality of life, and the recurrence rate of postoperative prolapse was compared. Results:Among the three groups, the TVH group had the shortest operation time and the LSC group had the least intraoperative blood loss ( P<0.05). The postoperative PFIQ-7 score improved the quality of life in the AFS group significantly better than the other two groups ( P<0.05). The postoperative POP-Q indicator points of the three groups were significantly improved than before ( P<0.05). Postoperative prolapse recurred in 8 cases (17.4%) in TVH group, 3 cases (8.8%) in LSC group and 1 case (5.0%) in AFS group, with no significant difference in recurrence rate among the three groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:These three surgical treatments are all safe and effective for the treatment of moderate to severe uterine prolapse. Various factors should be considered comprehensively to develop individualized surgical plans for patients.
