Development and validation on death risk model of Stanford type A aortic dissection based on Cox regression
10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210702-01000
- VernacularTitle:基于Cox回归的Stanford A型主动脉夹层死亡风险模型构建及验证
- Author:
Zhiran GUO
1
;
Sufang HUANG
;
Qiansheng WU
;
Yaru XIAO
;
Miqi LI
;
Quan ZHOU
;
Xiaorong LANG
;
Danni FENG
Author Information
1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院急诊科，湖北武汉 430030
- Keywords:
Stanford type A aortic dissection;
Prediction model of death risk;
Cox proportional hazards regression model
- From:
Chinese Critical Care Medicine
2021;33(11):1315-1321
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To construct the prediction model of death risk of Stanford type A aortic dissection (AAD) based on Cox proportional risk regression model.Methods:AAD patients who were diagnosed and received surgical treatment admitted to the department of cardiothoracic surgery of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 1st, 2019 to April 30th, 2020 were enrolled. The general situation, clinical manifestations, pre-hospital data, laboratory examination and imaging examination results of the patients were collected. The observation period was up to the death of the patients or ended on April 30th, 2021. They were divided into the model group and the verification group according to the ratio of 7∶3. Lasso method was used to screen prognostic variables from the data of the modeling group, and multivariate Cox regression analysis was included to construct the AAD death risk prediction model, which was displayed by nomogram. The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to evaluate the discrimination of the model, the calibration curve to evaluate the accuracy of the model, and the clinical decision curve (DCA) to evaluate the effectiveness of the model.Results:A totel of 454 patients with AAD were finally included, and the mortality was 19.4% (88/454). Lasso regression analysis was used to screen out 10 variables from the data of 317 patients in the model group, and the prediction model of death risk was constructed: 0.511×abdominal pain+1.061×syncope+0.428×lower limb pain/numbness-0.365×emergency admission-1.933×direct admission-1.493×diagnosis before referral+0.662×preoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 100 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa)+0.632×hypersensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) > 34.2 ng/L+1.402×De Bakey type+0.641× pulmonary infection+1.472×postoperative delirium. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the AAD death risk prediction model were 0.873 (0.817-0.928), and that of the verification group was 0.828 (0.740-0.916). DCA showed that the net benefit value of the model was higher. The calibration curve showed that there was a good correlation between the actual observation results and the model prediction results. Conclusion:The AAD death risk prediction model based on abdominal pain, syncope, lower limb pain/numbness, mode of admission, diagnosis before referral, preoperative SBP < 100 mmHg, hs-cTnI > 34.2 ng/L, De Bakey type , pulmonary infection, and postoperative delirium can effectively help clinicians identify patients at high risk for AAD, evaluate their postoperative survival and timely adjust treatment strategies.
