Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2022.01.022
- VernacularTitle:超声造影在炎症性肝细胞腺瘤诊断中的临床价值
- Author:
Ying ZHOU
1
;
Yanxia CHENG
Author Information
1. 浙江衢化医院超声科，衢州 324000
- Keywords:
Angiography;
Ultrasonic examination;
Adenoma,hepatocyte;
Hemodynamics;
Liver cancer;
Diagnosis;
Liver;
Hemangioma
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2022;29(1):106-110
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma.Methods:100 patients with inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma who received treatment in the Department of Oncology, Zhejiang Quhua Hospital, between March 2018 and March 2021, were included in this study. These patients were divided into < 5 cm group (control group, n = 65) and ≥ 5 cm group (observation group, n = 35) according to maximum tumor diameter. Routine ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography findings were compared between the two groups. Results:Pathological findings and immunohistochemical staining results confirmed all patients had inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma. There were 65 patients with maximum tumor diameter < 5 cm in the control group and 35 patients with maximum tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm in the observation group. Routine ultrasonography findings revealed there were no significant differences in internal echo, border, shape, and blood flow distribution between control and observation groups ( χ2 = 0.45, 0.08, 3.12, 3.54, all P > 0.05). In the control group, 56 (86.15%) patients had a uniform echo and 9 (13.85%) patients had an uneven echo. In the observation group, 19 (54.29%) patients had a uniform echo and 16 (45.71%) patients had an uneven echo. There were significant differences in the number of patients having a uniform echo or an uneven echo between the two groups ( χ2 = 12.32, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography results in terms of arterial phase enhancement mode, portal phase enhancement performance, delayed phase enhancement performance, and presence of a vessel sign under the capsule between the two groups ( χ2 = 0.65, 0.40, 1.75, 2.07, all P > 0.05). In the control group, 55 (84.62%) patients had a uniformly contrast-enhanced area, and 10 (15.38%) patients had a non-uniformly contrast-enhanced area, in the arterial phase at the peak intensity. In the observation group, 16 (45.71%) patients had a uniformly contrast-enhanced area, and 19 (54.29%) patients had a non-uniformly contrast-enhanced area, in the arterial phase at the peak intensity. There was a significant difference between the two groups ( χ2 = 16.52, P < 0.05). No patients from the control group had an internal perfusion defect, and 12 (34.29%) patients from the observation group had an internal perfusion defect. There was significant difference in the number of patients having an internal perfusion defect ( χ2 = 25.32, P < 0.05). High contrast enhancement in the arterial phase appeared in two groups. Conclusion:Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can display the imaging features of inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma, which reflects the hemodynamic differences among foci of different sizes and helps diagnose and treat inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma.
