Application of ultrasound-guided adhesiolysis combined with platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of rotator cuff injuries
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2022.01.013
- VernacularTitle:超声引导下粘连松解术联合富血小板血浆在肩袖损伤治疗中的应用
- Author:
Zhifeng ZHANG
1
;
Tao CHEN
Author Information
1. 陆军第七十二集团军医院手术室，湖州 313000
- Keywords:
Rotator cuff injury;
Shoulder pain;
Shoulder injuries;
Ultrasonography;
Tissue adhesions;
Platelet-rich plasma;
Shoulder joint
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2022;29(1):61-66
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided adhesiolysis combined with platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of rotator cuff injuries.Methods:The clinical data of 103 patients with rotator cuff injuries treated in The 72 nd Military Hospital of PLA from December 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment methods. The control group ( n = 48) was treated with ultrasound-guided adhesiolysis. The study group ( n = 55) was treated with ultrasound-guided adhesiolysis and intra-articular injection of platelet rich plasma. Therapeutic effects, pain score, shoulder function score, shoulder range of motion, healing rate, and re-tear rate were compared between the control and study groups. Results:Total effective rate was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group (96.36% vs. 81.25%, χ2 = 6.14, P < 0.05). Pain score in each group was significantly decreased after treatment compared with before treatment [study group: (1.69 ± 0.81) points vs. (6.13 ± 1.28) points; control group: (3.22 ± 1.05) points vs. (6.13 ± 1.28) points, t = 31.510, 8.33, both P < 0.001]. The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score in each group was significantly increased after treatment compared with before treatment [study group: (33.26 ± 3.81) points vs. (14.03 ± 2.96) points; control group: (28.81 ± 3.20) points vs. (13.92 ± 3.03) points, t = 42.13, 33.12, both P < 0.001]. Constant-Murley Score in each group was significantly increased after treatment compared with before treatment [study group: (94.22 ± 4.15) points vs. (55.29 ± 8.18) points; control group: (82.11 ± 8.13) points vs. (56.33 ± 7.83) points; t = 46.83, 22.38, both P < 0.001]. After treatment, pain score was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group [(1.69 ± 0.81) points vs. (3.22 ± 1.05) points, t = 8.33, P < 0.001]. UCLA score and CMS were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group [(33.26 ± 3.81) points vs. (28.81 ± 3.20) points, (94.22 ± 4.15) points vs. (82.11 ± 8.13) points, t = 6.37, 9.70, both P < 0.001]. After treatment, there were improvements in flexion [study group: (159.26 ± 13.51)° vs. (85.26 ± 11.35)°; control group: (150.22 ± 14.35)° vs. (86.33 ± 11.51)°; t = 45.15, 34.23, both P < 0.001], internal rotation at 90° abduction [study group: (83.64 ± 5.29)° vs. (60.33 ± 4.12)°; control group: (76.81 ± 4.82)° vs. (60.61 ± 4.51)°; t = 36.74, 24.06, both P < 0.001], abduction [study group: (161.29 ± 10.76)° vs. (72.91 ± 5.16)°; control group: (152.81 ± 11.84) ° vs. (73.26 ± 5.22)°; t = 82.34, 64.61, both P < 0.001], external rotation at 90° abduction [study group: (87.82 ± 3.04)° vs. (4.29 ± 5.18)°; control group: (80.22 ± 4.13)° vs. (80.22 ± 4.13)°; t = 42.46, 21.55, both P < 0.001] , and external rotation in neutral position [study group: (43.18 ± 3.20)° vs. (22.85 ± 4.12)°; control group: (37.26 ± 4.12)° vs. (22.64 ± 3.95)°; t = 41.19, 25.10, both P < 0.001] in each group compared with before treatment. After treatment, range of motion of the shoulder in the above positions was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group [flexion: (159.26 ± 13.51)° vs. (150.22 ± 14.35)°; internal rotation at 90° abduction: (83.64 ± 5.29)° vs. (76.81 ± 4.82)°; abduction: (161.29 ± 10.76)° vs. (152.81 ± 11.84)°; external rotation at 90° abduction: (87.82 ± 3.04)° vs. (80.22 ± 4.13)°; external rotation in neutral position: (43.18 ± 3.20)° vs. (37.26 ± 4.12)°, t = 3.29, 6.81, 3.81, 10.72, 8.20, all P < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in healing rate between the study and control groups (1.82% vs. 16.67%, χ2 = 5.35, P < 0.05). Conclusion:Ultrasound-guided adhesiolysis combined with platelet-rich plasma is highly effective in the treatment of rotator cuff injuries because it can greatly improve shoulder function, reduce pain degree, and increase the range of motion of the shoulder.
