Constructing the educational quality evaluation system for the master of public health
10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210513-00780
- VernacularTitle:公共卫生硕士专业学位研究生培养质量评价体系构建
- Author:
Rui ZHANG
1
;
Chengcheng GAO
;
Qiuyue SONG
;
Jia CHEN
;
Fang LI
;
Xicheng CHEN
;
Dong YI
;
Yazhou WU
Author Information
1. 陆军军医大学军事预防医学系军队卫生统计学教研室，重庆 400038
- Keywords:
Master of public health;
Professional degree;
Training quality;
Analytic hierarchy process;
Evaluation system
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2022;21(3):261-266
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To construct a practical education training quality evaluation system that can monitor the entire training process for the master of public health, and to provide a basis for improving the public health education system.Methods:Based on the survey of the current status of the master of public health, combined with the literature survey, the focus group discussion and the expert forum, an evaluation system was established, and the weight coefficient of each index was determined by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). All data were entered by Excel double-person, and matlabR2018a was used to calculate the weight, and determine the maximum characteristic root of the matrix, consistency index and consistency ratio.Results:The evaluation index system consisted of 7 first-level indicators and 24 second-level indicators. The average authority coefficient of 32 experts was 0.791. The top three items with the highest weight in the first-level indicators were mentor guidance (0.213), professional practice (0.157) and scientific research topics (0.149). The weight coefficient consistency ratio ( CR) was 0.040, showing that the consistency test passed ( CR<0.1). Conclusion:The educational quality evaluation system of the master of public health constructed by the institute is scientific, and the weight of the evaluation index reflects the focus of the postgraduate training process of the master of public health, which can provide a reference for improving the quality of public health professionals.
