Clinical application of two kinds of minimally invasive methods in choledocholithiasis complicated with gallbladder stones
10.3760/cma.j.cn115667-20210424-00086
- VernacularTitle:两种微创术式在胆总管结石合并胆囊结石中的临床应用
- Author:
Shizhou LIU
1
;
Jiefeng HE
;
Yanjun LI
Author Information
1. 山西白求恩医院普通外科，太原 030000
- Keywords:
Cholecystectomy, laparoscopic;
Sphincterotomy, endoscopic;
Cholelithiasis;
Validation studies
- From:
Chinese Journal of Pancreatology
2022;22(1):61-65
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)+ laparoscopic choledocholithotomy (LCBDE)+ one-stage suture and primary choledocholithotomy with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)+ endoscopic duodenal sphincterotomy (EST)+ nasobiliary drainage (ENBD)+ LC in the treatment of choledocholithiasis complicated with gallbladder stones.Methods:A total of 200 patients with choledocholithiasis complicated with gallbladder stones admitted to the General Surgery Department of Shanxi Bethune Hospital from June 2015 to February 2021 were collected, and patients were divided into LC+ LCBDE+ one-stage suture (one-stage suture group, n=130) and ERCP+ EST+ ENBD+ LC (endoscopic surgery group, n=70) according to different treatments. The amount of intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative feeding time, postoperative incidence of pancreatitis, cholangitis and other complications (biliary leakage, abdominal bleeding, wound infection), hospitalization costs, postoperative hospital stay, etc were compared between two groups. Results:The postoperative incidence of pancreatitis in the one-stage suture group (0.7% vs 5.7%) and the hospitalization cost [(2.74±0.39) ten thousand yuan vs (3.86±0.63) ten thousand yuan] were significantly lower than those in the endoscopic surgery group. The operation time [(103.21±9.36) min vs (88.18±7.20)min] was significantly longer than that of the endoscopic surgery group, and postoperative feeding time [(3.3±0.3)d vs (2.2±0.8)d] were significantly later than the endoscopic surgery group ( P<0.05). The amount of intraoperative blood loss [(36.0±3.0)ml vs (37.3±2.7)ml], the incidence of postoperative cholangitis (1.5% vs 2.9%) and other complications [biliary leakage (2.3% vs 1.4%), abdominal bleeding (1.5% vs 4.3%), wound infection(0 vs 0)], postoperative hospital stay [(6.8±1.3)d vs (7.1)d] had no significant differences between the two group. Conclusions:The two minimally invasive methods for the treatment of choledocholithiasis complicated with gallbladder stones had good efficacy, but LC+ LCBDE+ one-stage suture can retain the sphincter function of Oddis, maintain the normal anatomy and physiology of the biliary tract, reduce the incidence of related complications, and contribute to the recovery of patients, with high safety, effectiveness and feasibility.
