The value of serum anti-Mullerian hormone combined with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography in predicting ovarian reserve function in infertility patients
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20201208-01771
- VernacularTitle:血清抗苗勒管激素联合经阴道彩色多普勒超声预测不孕症患者卵巢储备功能的价值研究
- Author:
Zhijie ZHANG
1
;
Jing FAN
;
Qing WANG
;
Xiaohong ZHONG
Author Information
1. 德州市人民医院超声科，德州 253000
- Keywords:
Infertility, female;
Anti-Mullerian hormone;
Ultrasonography, Doppler, transvaginal;
Ovarian reserve function
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2022;45(2):123-126
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the predictive value of serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) combined with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography (vaginal color ultrasound) for ovarian reserve function in infertility patients.Methods:A total of 105 infertility patients diagnosed and treated in Dezhou People′s Hospital from January 2018 to October 2020 were selected as study subjects. Among them, 32 patients with less than 5 eggs obtained after the first treatment (low ovarian response) were included in group A, and 73 patients with 5 to 15 eggs obtained (normal ovarian response) were included in group B. Serum AMH levels were measured, antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian volume (OV), and ovarian stromal peak diastolic systolic velocity (PSV) were recorded by vaginal ultrasound. The levels of above index in A, B groups, patients aged > 35 years old, and those aged ≤35 years old were compared. Moreover, the correlation among serum AMH level and aged, ultrasonic parameters were analyzed. The efficacy of serum AMH level and AFC, OV and PSV in predicting low ovarian response was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Results:The levels of serum AMH, AFC, OV and PSV in group A were lower than those in group B: (0.69 ± 0.28) μg/L vs. (1.43 ± 0.44) μg/L, (8.52 ± 2.29) eggs vs. (11.15 ± 2.56) eggs, (3.12 ± 0.70) cm 3 vs. (4.50 ± 1.31) cm 3, (8.80 ± 2.14) cm/s vs. (15.80 ± 4.43) cm/s, the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). The levels of serum AMH, AFC, OV and PSV in aged > 35 years old group were lower than those in aged ≤35 years old group: (0.64 ± 0.20) g/L vs. (1.71 ± 0.46) μg/L, (8.35 ± 2.68) eggs vs. (12.17 ± 2.79) eggs, (3.05 ± 0.78) cm 3 vs. (5.02 ± 1.26) cm 3, (9.01 ± 3.04) cm/s vs. (17.90 ± 4.19) cm/s, the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). Serum AMH level was negatively correlated with age ( r = -0.317, P<0.05), and positively correlated with AFC, OV and PSV ( r = 0.288, 0.326, 0.370, P<0.05). The sensitivity and specificity for the evaluation of low ovarian response by AMH+AFC+OV+PSV were 96.90% and 100.00% respectively. Conclusions:The sensitivity and specificity of serum AMH combined with vaginal color ultrasound for the evaluation of ovarian reserve function in infertility patients are both high.
