Investigation and research on We-Media platforms opened and operated by surgeons in tertiary first-class hospitals
10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20220126-00060
- VernacularTitle:三级甲等医院外科医师开设和运营自媒体平台的调查分析报告
- Author:
Jianhong ZHONG
1
;
Mingda WANG
;
Haotian LIU
;
Zhanguo ZHANG
;
Guole LIN
;
Lei ZHAO
;
Linlin SHEN
;
Min CHEN
;
Tian YANG
Author Information
1. 广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院肝胆外科，南宁 530021
- Keywords:
Surgery;
Popular science;
We-Media platforms;
Surgeons;
Questionnaire
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
2022;21(4):475-482
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the status of We-Media platforms opened and opera-ted by surgeons in tertiary first-class hospitals nationwide and analyze its influence on patients and surgeons.Methods:The retrospective cross-sectional investigation study was conducted. The investigation was conducted on the surgeons who had opened We-Media platforms in their units or associations through the contact of all members of the second Elite Committee of Chinese Digestive Surgery of the Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery from November 5 to 30, 2021. Questionnaires were distributed through wechat, and the software platform was Questionnaire Star. Observation indicators: (1) results of questionnaire survey; (2) basic information of surgeons running We-Media platforms; (3) daily workload and research background of surgeons running We-Media platforms; (4) information related to We-Media platforms; (5) influence of running We-Media platforms on patients; (6) influence of running We-Media platforms on surgeons; (7) feelings and suggestion of surgeons after running We-Media platforms. Measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as Mean± SD, and count data were expressed as absolute numbers and percentages. Results:(1) Results of questionnaire survey: a total of 229 complete and valid questionnaires were collected in this survey. (2) Basic information of surgeons running We-Media platforms: of 229 surgeons, there were 195 males and 34 females, aged (40±8)years. There were 120 surgeons aged from 36-45 years, 80 surgeons aged <35 years and 29 surgeons aged >45 years. There were 86.46% (198/229) of surgeons from teaching hospitals and 74.67%(171/229) of surgeons from provincial cities. Of 229 surgeons, junior, intermediate, deputy senior and senior titles accounted for 17.90%(41/229), 27.51%(63/229), 37.12%(85/229) and 17.47%(40/229), respectively. Surgeons with working years ≤5 years, 6-10 years, 11-15 years and ≥16 years accounted for 19.21%(44/229), 22.27%(51/229), 26.64%(61/229) and 31.88%(73/229), respectively. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeons, esophageal and gastrointestinal surgeons were the main specialties, accounting for 48.03%(110/229) and 14.41%(33/229), respectively. The original intentions of opening We-Media platforms (multiple choice) included increasing patient population and improving the income, accumulating cases to facilitate clinical research projects, increasing the popularity of the industry and gain peer recognition, increasing social awareness and improving spiritual satisfaction, passive assignments form units or hospitals, which accounted for 52.84% (121/229), 54.15%(124/229), 64.19%(147/229), 58.08%(133/229), 17.90%(41/229), respectively. (3) Daily workload and research background of surgeons running We-Media platforms: 60.26%(138/229) of surgeons participated in offline social welfare activities 1-3 times per year and 26.64%(61/229) of surgeons participated >3 times per year. There were 47.60% (109/229) of surgeons performing 5-10 operations per week and 33.19%(76/229) of surgeons performing >10 operations per week. In terms of scientific researches, 38.43%(88/229) of surgeons had not published high-quality English articles as the first author or co-first author, 24.89%(57/229) of surgeons had published 1-3 articles and 36.68%(84/229) of surgeons had published >3 articles. There were 51.09%(117/229) of surgeons without any longitu-dinal projects, 13.54%(31/229) of surgeons with national projects, 35.37%(81/229) of surgeons with provincial and ministerial projects. (4) Information related to We-Media platforms: there were 65.50%(150/229) of surgeons running wechat public account, 55.02%(126/229) of surgeons running consultation platform, 31.44%(72/229) of surgeons running TikTok, 21.40%(49/229) of surgeons running wechat video account (some surgeons operated multiple We-Media platforms). The time of operating the platform was <1 year in 35.81%(82/229) of surgeons, 1-3 years in 42.79%(98/229) of surgeons, >3 years in 21.40%(49/229) of surgeons, respectively. The contents of We-Media platforms were updated >2 weeks in 45.85%(105/229) of surgeons. There were 63.32%(145/229) of surgeons with We-Media platforms win-ning emotional support from their department or hospital, 12.66%(29/229) of surgeons with We-Media platforms winning financial support. There were 82.53%(189/229) of surgeons operating We-Media platforms by theirselves. The We-Media plat-form operation was smooth in 47.16%(108/229) of surgeons, unsustainable in 50.22%(115/229) of surgeons and suspended in 2.62%(6/229) of surgeons. On average, it took less than 30 minutes for 60.70%(139/229) of surgeons and 30-60 minutes for 27.07%(62/229) of surgeons to operate the We-Media platforms of surgeons every times, respec-tively. The background message or consulta-tion was allowed in 89.08%(204/229) of surgeons. The number of leaving messages was <5 times in 52.84%(121/229) of surgeons and >50 times in 6.99%(16/229) of surgeons. On average, each content in 59.39%(136/229) of surgeons were "liked" or "viewed" <100 times, and each content in 29.26%(67/229) of surgeons were "liked" or "viewed" 100-300 times. There were 60.26%(138/229) of surgeons having content with the highest "liked" or "viewed" clicks <1 000 times and 6.99%(16/229) of surgeons having content with the highest "liked" or "viewed" clicks >10 million times. On average, each content in 74.67%(171/229) of surgeons were "forwarded" <100 times, and each content in 6.55%(15/229) of surgeons were "forwarded" >300 times, respectively. The number of followers was <1 million in 87.34%(200/229) of surgeons. The We-Media audiences (multiple choices) included related professional peers, related health care professionals, patients of surgeons, general public, accounting for 42.36%(97/229), 31.00%(71/229), 52.40%(120/229), 53.71%(123/229), respectively. (5) Influence of running We-Media platforms on patients: 34.93%(80/229) of surgeons believed that the operation of We-Media platform significantly increased the number of outpatient and inpatient patients of themselves, 29.69%(68/229) of surgeons believed that the operation of We-Media platform significantly increased the number of outpatient and inpatient patients in their departments, respectively. In the view of 75.98%(174/229) of surgeons, the percent of outpatient and inpatient patients by We-Media platforms was <10%. After 6 months of We-Media operation, 39.74%(91/229) and 25.33%(58/229) of surgeons believed that inpatient and outpatient compliance was significantly improved, respectively, and 46.29% (106/229) of surgeons believed that preopera-tive and pre-chemotherapy or pre-radiotherapy conversations saved more time. (6) Influence of running We-Media platforms on surgeons: 20.09%(46/229) and 6.55%(15/229) of surgeons attributed the success to "long-term, sustainable, absorbed operation" and "important contents of We-Media platforms and wide audiences". There were 72.49%(166/229) of surgeons yet to be successful. There were 26.64% (61/229) and 22.27%(51/229) of surgeons believing that opening We-Media platforms was conducive to the association's employment and multicenter clinical research. Operating We-Media platforms was conducive to professional knowledge improvement, clinical research ability enhancement and teaching level of students, which was believed by 54.59%(125/229), 40.17%(92/229) and 48.91%(112/229) of surgeons, respectively. Although the total income in 88.65%(203/229) of surgeons increased less than 20% after 6 months of operation, 47.60%(109/229) of surgeons believed that "the sense of achievement or pleasure in work has been significantly improved", and 48.91%(112/229) of surgeons did not have the idea of quitting. There were 7.42%(17/229) of surgeons with the idea of quitting the operation of We-Media platforms. (7) Feelings and suggestions of surgeons after running We-Media platforms: the proportion of surgeons who hoped to get help from departments, hospitals, associations and the society were 61.57%(141/229), 72.05%(165/229), 47.16%(108/229) and 53.28%(122/229), respectively. Only 9.61%(22/229) of surgeons did not require help. Commercial advertisement was allowed by 40.17%(92/229) of surgeons and forbidden by 59.83%(137/229) of surgeons. In terms of alternative suggestion, 70.74%(162/229) of surgeons believed that it was necessary for the We-Media platforms to involve more doctors of different specialties, but 40.61%(93/229) of surgeons believed that relevant departments or associations should strengthen supervision under the current situation. In addition, 32.75%(75/229) of surgeons believed that the operation of We-Media platform requires more investment. The were 27.95%(64/229) of surgeons giving specific suggestions on running We-Media platforms, 7.81%(5/64) of which did not suggest a blind try.Conclusions:Most surgeons who open and operate We-Media platforms in China are faced with problems such as busy work, limited time and energy, low-income increase, and lack of professional promotion and maintenance teams and external support. Even so, there are still many surgeons who have achieved success through long-term persistence and high-quality content output, thus increasing the number of patient visits, improving their own ability and industry influence, and bringing a greater sense of professional achievement.
