Network Meta-analysis of the impact of different non-pharmacological interventions on blood glucose management in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20201228-04964
- VernacularTitle:不同非药物干预方案对儿童和青少年1型糖尿病血糖管理影响的网状Meta分析
- Author:
Yunyun GUO
1
;
Ling FAN
Author Information
1. 中国医科大学附属盛京医院护理部，沈阳 110004
- Keywords:
Child;
Adolescent;
Non-pharmacological interventions;
Blood glucose management;
Network meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2022;38(13):1027-1034
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate and rank the effects of different non-pharmaceutical interventions on the management of blood glucose in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes by Bayesian network Meta-analysis.Methods:Computer search for PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, China Biomedical Literature Database, China Knowledge Network, Wangfang Data and VIP Database, China and the United States Clinical Registration Center, the search time limit is from the establishment of each database to December 2020. Use WinBUGS, GeMTC, Stata software for blood glucose management data analysis.Results:Finally, 37 articles were included, with a total of 4 188 cases, involving 14 non-pharmaceutical intervention programs. The results of the network Meta-analysis showed that when different non-pharmacological interventions were used, the effectiveness of blood glucose management in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes was ranked as follows: peer support education first, cognitive behavioral therapy second, advanced diabetes education third, family support intervention fourth, self guided intervention (GSD-Y) fifth, case training sixth, positive psychological intervention seventh, mobile phone based remote intervention eighth, diabetes education ninth, supportive consultation tenth, network based remote intervention eleventh position, multi-system therapy multi system therapy twelfth, conventional nursing thirteenth, motivational interview fourteenth.Conclusions:The available evidence shows that peer support education and cognitive behavioral therapy show certain advantages in blood glucose management in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, while motivational interviews perform the worst. Future research will further consider other potential benefits of non-pharmacological interventions, such as emotional health and diabetes self-management behavior.
