Intervention effect of descending noninvasive positive pressure ventilation on postoperative hypoxemia in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection complicated with obesity
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20210715-01998
- VernacularTitle:降阶梯无创正压通气对Stanford A型主动脉夹层合并肥胖患者术后低氧血症的护理干预效果
- Author:
Jinglan SUN
1
;
Hongyan ZHOU
;
Chunling REN
;
Ying WANG
;
Yanfeng ZHANG
;
Meiying CUI
Author Information
1. 西安交通大学第一附属医院血管外科周围血管科，西安 710061
- Keywords:
Obese;
Nnoninvasive positive pressure ventilation;
Hypoxemia;
De-escalation therapy;
Aortic dissection;
Stanford type A
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2022;38(13):1004-1010
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effect of deescalation noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the removal of endotracheal intubation in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection (AAD) complicated with obesity.Methods:A total of 80 obese patients with AAD from March 2018 to January 2020 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University were divided into experimental group and control group with 40 cases in each group by random number table method. The control group received traditional oxygen treatment with mask, while the experimental group received de-escalation noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. The blood gas index, respiratory rate and respiratory comfort score was recorded at different times before and after intervention, make a comparison with the two groups in the incidence of hypoxemia, secondary intubation and other complications.Results:Finally, 36 cases were included in the experimental group and 38 cases in the control group. After 2, 8, 24, 48, 72 h of extubation, the oxygenation index, PaO 2, SaO 2 were higher and PaCO 2, respiratory rate were lower in the experimental group compared to the control group, the differences were statistically significant ( t values were 2.02-9.00, all P<0.05). At 72 h after extubation, the pH value of the experimental group was 7.43 ± 0.08, which was higher than 7.38 ± 0.09 of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=2.44, P<0.05). At 24, 48, 72 h after extubation, the throat pain scores and oral nasal dryness symptom and sore throat symptom scores were (3.11 ± 1.53), (2.25 ± 0.57), (0.94 ± 0.14) points and (4.33 ± 1.08), (3.33 ± 0.68), (2.81 ± 0.43) points in the experimental group, lower than in the control group (5.24 ± 1.96), (3.58 ± 0.73), (2.18 ± 0.91) points and (6.00 ± 1.92), (5.39 ± 1.13), (4.79 ± 0.54) points, the differences were statistically significant ( t values were 3.46-5.21, all P<0.05). The incidence of hypoxemia, secondary intubation and intolerance were 2.8% (1/36), 2.8% (1/36) and 0 in the experimental group, lower than in the control group 26.3% (10/38), 21.1% (8/38) and 10.5% (4/38), the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=8.09, 5.78, 4.01, all P<0.05). Conclusions:De-escalation noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for obese patients with AAD can effectively improve oxygenation, reduce the incidence of hypoxemia and secondary intubation, and alleviate respiratory symptoms.
