The effect of eCASH model on negative emotion and risk of related adverse events in patients with severe continuous renal replacement therapy
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20210430-01280
- VernacularTitle:eCASH模式对重症连续肾脏替代治疗患者负性情绪及相关不良事件风险的影响
- Author:
Meifeng XIONG
1
;
Caihua CHEN
;
Haiyan ZHUANG
;
Yuanyuan ZHANG
Author Information
1. 深圳市中西医结合医院重症医学科，深圳 518104
- Keywords:
eCASH;
Severe continuous renal replacement therapy;
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale;
Simple McGill Pain Questionnaire
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2022;38(3):186-191
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effects of early Comfort using Analgesics, minimal Sedatives and maximum Humane care (eCASH) patterns on the risk of negative mood and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)-related adverse events in patients with severe CRRT.Methods:A total of 90 patients with severe CRRT in Shenzhen Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital from October 2018 to October 2020 were selected as the study subjects, and they were divided into observation group and control group according to random number table method, with 45 patients in each group. The control group was given routine nursing program, and the observation group was given eCASH mode on the basis of the control group.Nursing satisfaction, CRRT-related adverse events and negative mood scores before and after nursing were compared between 2 groups.Results:The nursing satisfaction degree of the observation group was 86.67% (39/45), significantly higher than that of the control group (66.67%, 30/45), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=5.03, P<0.05). After nursing, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety(HADS-A) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression(HADS-D) scores of the observation group were 5.18 ± 0.67 and 5.27 ± 0.61, respectively, lower than 8.14 ± 1.18, 7.94 ± 1.07 before intervention, and 6.33 ± 0.72, 5.94 ± 0.49 of the control group. Barthel Index(BI) (65.17 ± 8.67) was significantly higher than that before nursing 41.56 ± 6.46 and control group 60.48 ± 6.47, the difference was statistically significant ( t values were 5.74-20.76, all P<0.05). The scores of Visual Analogue Scale(VAS), Present Pain Intensity(PPI), sensory total score and emotional total score of observation group after nursing were 3.24 ± 0.56, 1.18 ± 0.25, 6.38 ± 0.89, 2.68 ± 0.59 significantly lower than those before nursing 6.24 ± 0.87, 3.24 ± 0.56, 11.24 ± 1.81, 6.37 ± 1.04 and 4.36 ± 0.67, 1.31 ± 0.31, 7.26 ± 0.96, 2.98 ± 0.62 of the control group. The difference was statistically significant ( t values were 2.19-20.70, P<0.05). Conclusions:eCASH model can significantly improve the negative emotions of patients with severe CRRT, improve their comfort and reduce the risk of related adverse events, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
