Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided closed reduction for pediatric distal radius fracture
10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20210306-00269
- VernacularTitle:超声辅助下闭合复位治疗儿童桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效
- Author:
Xing WU
1
;
Xiongtao LI
;
Si WANG
;
Jingdong XIA
;
Xiaoliang CHEN
;
Qiusheng CHEN
;
Xiantao SHEN
Author Information
1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉儿童医院小儿骨科，武汉 430000
- Keywords:
Distal radius fracture;
Ultrasound;
X-ray;
Closed reduction
- From:
Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
2022;37(10):754-757
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided closed reduction and bare-handed reduction on pediatric distal radius fractures.Methods:Clinical data of 118 consecutive pediatric patients with distal radius fracture treated in the Wuhan Children′s Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology from April 2018 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients treated with bare-handed reduction and ultrasound-guided closed reduction were respectively classified into group Ⅰ (58 cases) and group Ⅱ (60 cases). Baseline characteristics, treatment duration, out-patient treatment cost, postoperative pain and the modified Mayo wrist function score during the follow-up visits between groups were compared by the t test.The success rate of initial reduction, reduction times, hospitalization rate and complication between 2 groups were compared by the Chi- square test.The number of postoperative imaging scans between 2 groups was compared by the Mann- Whitney U test. Results:There were no significant differences in out-patient treatment cost and hospitalization rate between 2 groups (all P>0.05). There were significant differences in the length of stay [ (166.2±54.8) min vs.(142.6±49.2) min], success rate of initial reductions [72.4%(42/58 cases ) vs.88.3%(53/60 cases)], incidence of repeated reductions (27.6% vs.1.7%) and the incidence of postoperative repeated imaging scans (20.7% vs.1.7%) between groupⅠ and group Ⅱ (all P<0.05). A total of 104 patients (88.1%) were successfully treated with closed reduction and followed up, with a rate of success reductions.Among them, success rate of closed reduction in group Ⅰ and Ⅱ were 86.2% and 90.0%, respectively.The mean time of fracture healing was 43 (34-56) days.There were no significant differences in fracture healing time and pain score between 2 groups(all P>0.05). The modified Mayo wrist score was significantly lower in group Ⅰ than that of group Ⅱ[(97.3±4.1) points vs.(98.8±2.9) points, P<0.05]. Seven patients in group Ⅰ suffered fracture re-displacement, including 6 cases within 1 case week and 1 within 2 weeks, and 4 cases admitted to the surgical ward for further management.Five patients in group Ⅱ had re-displacement within 1 week of plaster fixation, of which 2 cases admitted to the surgical ward for further management, which was comparable between groups( P>0.05). Conclusions:Both ultrasound-guided closed reduction and bare-handed reduction are effective on the treatment of pediatric distal radius fractures, showing low incidence of complications and satisfactory functional results.Owing to its higher success rate of initial reduction, lower frequency of postoperative ra-diography and shorter length of stay, ultrasound-guided closed reduction should be recommended.
