A retrospective study on 53 cases of subcutaneous tissue or subpectoral space implantation for breast reconstruction in breast cancer
10.3760/cma.j.cn.115807-20220105-00006
- VernacularTitle:乳腺癌一期胸大肌前或后植入假体行乳房重建53例回顾性分析
- Author:
Yuxia CHEN
1
;
Shengchao HUANG
;
Yuhang XU
;
Zongyuan WU
;
Jinzhong LI
;
Jianwen LI
;
Yuanqi ZHANG
Author Information
1. 广东医科大学附属医院乳腺外科，湛江 524000
- Keywords:
Breast cancer;
Breast reconstruction;
Subcutaneous tissue space implantation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery
2022;16(2):144-149
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the feasibility of the surgical mode of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IIBR) with silicone implants under subcutaneous tissue directly after the total mastectomy in breast cancer.Methods:Data of 53 patients who underwent (skin-sparing mastectomy, SSM) or (nipple-areola-complex-sparing mastectomy, NSM) combined with IIBR in Department of Breast Surgery, Maoming People’s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups, 31 cases with the silicone implant placed in different anatomical locations of the chest wall, including subcutaneous tissue, and 22 cases with subpectoral space implantation followed NSM or SSM. The two groups were compared in terms of the short-term and long-term complications, as well as the aesthetic outcome. Within 12 months the local recurrence rate was collected to evaluate the treatment safety of the two groups preserving the thickness of subcutaneous adipose after NSM or SSM.Results:There was no nipple-areola-complex (NAC) or skin flap for both groups, and the time of removing the drainage tube had no significant difference ( P>0.05) . There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the short-term complications within 6 months (repeated local infection and unknown effusion occurrence) , the long-term complications after 6 months (local skin with wrinkles sign, prosthesis displacement, and grade III-IV capsular contracture ( P>0.05) . However, the subcutaneous tissue implant group were superior ( P<0.05) in cosmetic outcome because of the breast had better symmetry. What’s more, no local tumor recurrence occurred in either group within 12 months. Conclusions:IIBR of subcutaneous tissue implantation (without patches) is an economical, novel, safe, and effective surgical mode for breast reconstruction, and the key to this operation mode depends on quality control of surgical procedures and the thickness of skin flap ≥ 1cm covering silicone implants. However, due to the cases enrolled in this study is not enough and short follow-up time, further clinical studies are still needed.
