Impact of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation on survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A Meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2022.04.011
- VernacularTitle:调度员指导的心肺复苏对院前心脏骤停生存率影响的Meta分析
- Author:
Pengcheng ZHAO
1
;
Qingyun GONG
;
Di WANG
;
Baoquan LI
;
Rui XU
;
Chunyu LI
;
Chao BI
;
Yanbin DONG
;
Jinsong ZHANG
;
Yan CHEN
Author Information
1. 南京医科大学第一附属医院妇幼重症医学科，南京 210029
- Keywords:
Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA);
First responder;
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR);
Meta-analysis;
Telephone;
Dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary
- From:
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
2022;31(4):487-496
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the outcome of the patients receiving dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) delivered by first-responders who witnessed the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) before the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) arrived.Methods:We performed a search of the relevant literature exploring major scientific databases. We assessed the quality of the included cohort study according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. Meta-analysis was performed on three outcome indicators (recovery of spontaneous circulation survival to hospital discharge and survival with favourable neurologic outcome) using the Revman5.3 software.Results:A total of 21 studies with 349 822 patients were selected for the meta-analysis, including 182 125 patients in the DA-CPR group and 167 697 in the CPR-only group. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the DA-CPR and CPR-only groups in ROSC [ RR=1.10, 95% confidence interval ( CI): 0.94-1.29, P=0.24], survival to hospital discharge ( RR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.90-1.34, P=0.34) and survival with favourable neurologic outcome ( RR=1.01, 95% CI: 0.79-1.28, P=0.97) of the patients in America, Japan and Korea. However, there was a significant difference between the DA-CPR and the CPR-only groups in ROSC ( RR=2.61, 95% CI:1.53-4.46, P=0.0005), survival to hospital discharge( RR=6.08, 95% CI: 1.84-20.04, P=0.003), and survival with favourable neurologic outcome( RR=9.76, 95% CI: 1.87-51.02, P=0.007) of the patients in China. Conclusions:The overall effect of DA-CPR is significantly different for each country. In detail, DA-CPR offers a survival advantage (Return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital discharge and survival with favourable neurologic outcome) over CPR alone in China but no advantage in developed countries.
