Application of enhanced recovery after surgery during perioperative period of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
10.3760/cma.j.cn115396-20211031-00421
- VernacularTitle:快速康复外科理念在后腹腔镜根治性肾切除术患者围手术期中的应用
- Author:
Zhengguo JI
1
;
Haibo ZHOU
;
Yongde XU
;
Peiqian YANG
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院泌尿外科 100050
- Keywords:
Enhanced recovery after surgery;
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic;
Radical nephrectomy;
Kidney neoplasms;
Perioperative care
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2021;48(12):814-818
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in perioperative period of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.Methods:The clinical data of 189 patients who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy from October 2015 to July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different perioperative management methods, they were divided into two groups: ERAS group ( n=97) and traditional group ( n=92). Patients of ERAS group were managed by the ERAS concept during the perioperative period, patients of traditional group were managed by the traditional method during the perioperative period. First drinking time after surgery, first exhaust time, 24 h postoperative pain score, first activity time out of bed, indwelling time of urinary catheter, indwelling time of drainage tube, postoperative hospital stay, incision length and complications of pneumonia and venous thrombosis were recorded and compared between the two groups. Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation ( Mean± SD), and independent sample t-test was used for comparison between groups; count data comparison between groups was by Chi-square test or Fisher exact probability method. Results:There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, tumor side, tumor diameter, maximum diameter of samples, T stage, diabetes and hypertension from between two groups ( P >0.05). In ERAS group, the time of first drinking water after surgery was (3.8±1.4) h, the time of first anal exhaust was (10.2±2.5) h, the 24 h pain score was (2.4±1.0), the time of first activity out of bed after surgery was (18.8±3.6) h, the indwelling time of urinary catheter was (19.8±3.7) h, the indwelling time of drainage tube was (3.4±0.5) d, the surgical incision length was (7.2±0.9) cm, and the postoperative hospital stay was (5.5±0.6) d. In the traditional group, the time of first drinking water after surgery was (21.2±4.2) h, the time of first anal exhaust was (20.1±4.3) h, the 24 h pain score was (5.4±1.0), the time of first activity out of bed after surgery was (32.8±7.8) h, the indwelling time of urinary catheter was (55.7±8.0) h, the indwelling time of drainage tube was (4.2±0.5) d, the surgical incision length was (13.6±1.5) cm, and the postoperative hospital stay was (7.2±1.3) d. There were statistically significant differences in these indexes between the two groups ( P<0.05). Conclusion:The clinical application of the concept of ERAS during the perioperative period can promote the rapid postoperative recovery of patients undergoing retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, and can effectively reflect the minimally invase advantages of retroperitoneal laparoscopic technology.
