Clinical implications of 3D printing technology in preoperative evaluation of partial nephrectomy.
10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210586
- Author:
Yinzhao WANG
1
;
Minfeng CHEN
2
;
Yangle LI
3
;
Cheng ZHAO
3
;
Shiyu TONG
3
;
Yi CAI
3
;
Ruizhe WANG
3
;
Tailai ZHOU
3
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China. wangyinzhao1229@163.com.
2. Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China. chenminfeng1999@csu.edu.cn.
3. Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
3D printing technology;
R.E.N.A.L score;
partial nephrectomy;
renal tumor
- MeSH:
Blood Loss, Surgical;
Creatinine;
Female;
Humans;
Ischemia;
Kidney Neoplasms/surgery*;
Laparoscopy/methods*;
Male;
Nephrectomy/methods*;
Printing, Three-Dimensional;
Retrospective Studies;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences)
2022;47(3):328-333
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES:Renal cancer is a common malignancy of the urinary system, and the partial nephrectomy is a common surgical modality for early renal cancer. 3D printing technology can create a visual three-dimensional model by using 3D digital models of the patient's imaging data. With this model, surgeons can perform preoperative assessment to clarify the location, depth, and blood supply of the tumor, which helps to develop preoperative plans and achieve better surgical outcomes. In this study, the R.E.N.A.L scoring system was used to stratify patients with renal tumors and to explore the clinical application value of 3D printing technology in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
METHODS:A total of 114 renal cancer patients who received laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in Xiangya Hospital from June 2019 to December 2020 were enrolled. The patients were assigned into an experimental group (n=52) and a control group (n=62) according to whether 3D printing technology was performed, and the differences in perioperative parameters between the 2 groups were compared. Thirty-nine patients were assigned into a low-complexity group (4-6 points), 32 into a moderate-complexity group (7-9 points), and 43 into a high-complexity group (10-12 points) according to R.E.N.A.L score, and the differences in perioperative parameters between the experimental group and the control group in each score group were compared.
RESULTS:The experimental group had shorter operative time, renal ischemia time, and postoperative hospital stay (all P<0.05), less intraoperative blood loss (P=0.047), and smaller postoperative blood creatinine change (P=0.032) compared with the control group. In the low-complexity group, there were no statistically significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in operation time, renal ischemia time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood creatinine changes, and postoperative hospital stay (all P>0.05). In the moderate- and high- complexity groups, the experimental group had shorter operative time, renal ischemia time, and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05 or P<0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (P=0.022 and P<0.001, respectively), and smaller postoperative blood creatinine changes (P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively) compared with the control group.
CONCLUSIONS:Compared with renal tumor patients with R.E.N.A.L score<7, renal cancer patients with R.E.N.A.L score≥7 may benefit more from 3D printing assessment before undergoing partial nephrectomy.
