Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of adjacent segment lumbar disc herniation after lumbar fusion.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.05.008
- Author:
Chao LOU
1
;
Wei-Yang YU
1
;
Jian CHEN
1
;
Deng-Wei HE
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedics, Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Endoscopy;
Intervertebral disk displacement;
Lumbar vertebrae;
Spinal fusion
- MeSH:
Aged;
Aged, 80 and over;
Blood Loss, Surgical;
Diskectomy;
Diskectomy, Percutaneous;
Endoscopy;
Female;
Humans;
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery*;
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery*;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Retrospective Studies;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2022;35(5):448-453
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore the clinical effect of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of adjacent segment lumbar disc herniation after lumbar fusion.
METHODS:From February 2010 to June 2018, 64 patients with adjacent segment lumbar disc herniation after lumbar fusion were retrospectively analyzed and divided into observation group and control group. In observation group, there were 23 males and 10 females performed with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, including 27 cases of single segment fusion and 6 cases of double segment fusion, aged from 55 to 83 years old with an average of (65.7±7.4) years old. In control group, there were 22 males and 9 females performed with traditional open fusion revision, including 25 cases of single-segment fusion and 6 cases of double segment fusion, aged from 51 to 78 years old with an average of(64.8±7.8) years old. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, postoperative ambulation time and length of postoperative hospital stay were recorded. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by visual analogue scale(VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index(ODI). The complications between two groups were observed.
RESULTS:All patients were followed up for at least 2 years. The observation group patients were followed up with an average of (2.4±0.5) years. The control group patients were followed up with an average of(2.6±0.7) years. Compared with control group, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative ambulation time and length of postoperative hospital stay of the observation group were significantly reduced (P<0.05), and the fluoroscopy times of observation group were significantly increased compared with control group(P<0.05). The VAS of low back and lower limb, and ODI at the latest follow-up between two groups were all significantly improved compared to those of pre-operation (P<0.05). The VAS of low back at each point and ODI at 1, 3 months after operation in observation group was significantly reduced compared with control group(P<0.05), however there was no significant difference in VAS for lower limb between two groups (P>0.05). The difference of complications between two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:Compared with traditional open fusion revision surgery, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of adjacent segment lumbar disc herniation after lumbar fusion has the advantages of reducing operation time and intra-operative blood loss, shortening ambulation time and the length of postoperative hospital stay, and promoting pain and functional improvement, and decrease incidence of complications. However, long-term clinical efficacy needs further study.
