Diagnostic Accuracy of CT for Evaluating Circumferential Resection Margin Status in Resectable or Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer: A Prospective Study Using Axially Sliced Surgical Pathologic Correlation
- Author:
Ji Hoon PARK
1
;
Yoo-Seok YOON
;
Seungjae LEE
;
Hae Young KIM
;
Ho-Seong HAN
;
Jun Suh LEE
;
Won CHANG
;
Haeryoung KIM
;
Hee Young NA
;
Seungyeob HAN
;
Kyoung Ho LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology 2022;23(3):322-332
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Objective:CT plays a central role in determining the resectability of pancreatic cancer, which directs the use of neoadjuvant therapy. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CT in predicting circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer.
Materials and Methods:Seventy-seven patients who were scheduled for upfront surgery for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer were prospectively enrolled, and 75 patients (38 male and 37 female; mean age ± standard deviation, 68 ± 11 years) were finally analyzed. The CRM status was evaluated separately for the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and posterior and superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV) margins. Three independent radiologists reviewed the preoperative CT images and evaluated the resection margin status. The reference standard for CRM status was pathologic examination of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens in an axial plane perpendicular to the axis of the second portion of the duodenum. The diagnostic accuracy of CT was assessed for overall CRM involvement, defined as involvement of the SMA or posterior margins (per-patient analysis), and involvement of each of the three resection margins (per-margin analysis). The data were pooled using a crossed random effects model.
Results:Forty patients had pathologically confirmed overall CRM involvement in pancreatic cancer, while CRM involvement was not seen in 35 patients. For overall CRM involvement, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 15% (95% confidence interval: 7%–49%) and 99% (96%–100%), respectively. For each of the resection margins, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 14% (9%–54%) and 99% (38%–100%) for the SMA margin, 12% (8%–46%) and 99% (97%–100%) for the posterior margin; and 37% (29%–53%) and 96% (31%–100%) for the SMV/PV margin, respectively.
Conclusion:CT showed very high specificity but low sensitivity in predicting pathological CRM involvement in pancreatic cancer.
