The anti-nociceptive effect of BPC-157 on the incisional pain model in rats
10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.2.97
- Author:
Young-Hoon JUNG
1
;
Haekyu KIM
;
Hyaejin KIM
;
Eunsoo KIM
;
Jiseok BAIK
;
Hyunjong KANG
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
2022;22(2):97-105
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:The pentadecapeptide BPC-157 has been shown to have anti-inflammatory and wound healing effects on multiple target tissues and organs. Peptides have potent anti-inflammatory effects on periodontal tissues in rats with periodontitis. Few studies have investigated the effect of BPC-157 on pain after dental procedures or oral surgeries. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the antinociceptive effects of BPC-157 on postoperative incisional pain in rats.
Methods:Sprague–Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups: control (saline with the same volume), BPC10 (10 μg/kg of BPC-157), BPC20 (20 μg/kg of BPC-157), BPC40 (40 μg/kg of BPC-157), and morphine (5 mg/kg of morphine). A 1-cm longitudinal incision was made through the skin, fascia, and muscle of the plantar aspect of the hind paw in isoflurane-anesthetised rats. Withdrawal responses were measured using von Frey filaments at 0, 2, 6 h and 4, 7 d after incision. The formalin test was also performed to differentiate its anti-nociceptive effect from an inflammatory reaction or central sensitization. Pain behavior was quantified periodically in phases 1 and 2 by counting the number of flinches in the ipsilateral paw after injection with 30 μL of 5% formalin.
Results:The threshold of mechanical allodynia was significantly increased in the BPC10, BPC20, BPC40 and morphine groups compared with that in the control group at 2 h. These increasing thresholds then returned to the levels of the control group. The BPC-157 group showed a much higher threshold at 4 days after incision than the control group. The thresholds of the BPC groups, except the morphine group, were normalized 7 days after incision. The flinching numbers of the BPC10, BPC20, BPC40 and morphine groups were significantly decreased in phase 1, but there was no decrease in the BPC-157 groups except the morphine group in phase 2.
Conclusions:BPC-157 was effective only for a short period after incision. It was also effective during phase 1 but not during phase 2, as determined by the formalin test. BPC-157 might have a short antinociceptive effect, even though it has anti-inflammatory and wound healing effects.
