Ineffectiveness of Skin Tests in Predicting Allergic Reactions Induced by Chinese Herbal Injections.
10.1007/s11655-021-3523-2
- Author:
Chun-Xiao LYU
1
;
Jun-Hua ZHANG
2
;
Bao-He WANG
1
;
Bo-Li ZHANG
3
;
Chang-Xiao LIU
4
;
Yan-Fen LI
1
;
Yu-Hong HUANG
5
Author Information
1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300250, China.
2. Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300250, China.
3. Tianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300250, China.
4. State Key Laboratory of Drug Delivery Technology and Pharmacokinetics, Tianjin Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, Tianjin, 300250, China.
5. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300250, China. hyh101@126.com.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Chinese herbal injections;
adverse drug reactions;
allergic reactions;
skin tests
- MeSH:
China;
Humans;
Hypersensitivity;
Intradermal Tests;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Skin Tests
- From:
Chinese journal of integrative medicine
2022;28(1):36-42
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate whether skin tests are suitable to predict the allergy reactions induced by Chinese herbal injections (CHIs).
METHODS:The skin tests including skin prick tests (SPT), intradermal tests (IDT) and provocation tests including subcutaneous tests and intravenous tests were administered to 249 healthy subjects and 180 allergic patients for 3 CHIs, including ginkgolide injection, diterpene ginkgolide meglumine injection and Salvianolate lyophilized injection. The results of the provocation tests were used as the "gold standard" to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the skin tests.
RESULTS:The results did not show any significant differences between the healthy and allergy groups in both skin tests and provocation tests (P>0.05). The specificities of SPT and IDT were 0.976 and 0.797, respectively, and the sensitivities of both SPT and IDT were 0.
CONCLUSION:Skin tests are insufficient to predict the likelihood of allergic reactions resulting from CHIs. (ChiCTR-CPC-15006921).
