Pre-Transfusion Testing and Transfusion Strategy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma after Daratumumab Treatment.
10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2021.05.035
- Author:
Xiao-Min FANG
1
;
Zhao-Wang GUO
1
;
Jun-Quan YANG
2
;
Bin YANG
3
;
Yan-Hui XIAO
2
;
Yan LIU
1
;
Mei-Ling XU
4
Author Information
1. Department of Experimental Medicine (Department of Laboratory, Department of Blood Transfusion), The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong Province, China.
2. Zhuhai Besso Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong Province, China.
3. Department of Experimental Medicine (Department of Laboratory, Department of Blood Transfusion), The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong Province, China,E-mail: zdwy2003@163.com.
4. Department of Pharmacy, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong Province, China,E-mail: 386092777@qq.com.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Antibodies, Monoclonal;
Blood Transfusion;
Dithiothreitol;
Humans;
Multiple Myeloma/therapy*
- From:
Journal of Experimental Hematology
2021;29(5):1595-1600
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the procedure of pre-transfusion testing and transfusion strategy of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated by daratumumab (DarA).
METHODS:The blood samples of MM patients before and after DarA treatment from the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were collected, and the ABO/Rh blood group antigen identification and DAT test results were compared. The results of antibody screening and cross matching of the patients before and after inactivation of red blood cells with 0.2 mol/L dithiothreitol (DTT) were compared and analyzed.
RESULTS:ABO/Rh blood group antigen typing showed no affecting in patients after treated by DarA; the result of DAT test showed negative. Irregular antibody screening showed that all the three cells(Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ) were positive(1+~2+) and the self-control was negative. By microcolumn agglutination method, the main side of the multi-bag of blood showed no matched, while the secondary side showed all identical. After treated by DTT solution, the cross matching results in reagent red blood cells and the red blood cells of blood donors were both consistent, and the irregular antibody screening was negative. The K(+)O type erythrocytes used in parallel control were transformed into K(-)O type erythrocytes after DTT treatment. However, there was no significant changes in E(+) O type erythrocytes before and after DTT treatment. There was no condensation on the primary and secondary side of the condensed amine method. The primary and secondary sides of blood matching by saline method showed negative.
CONCLUSION:After treated by DarA, cross matching results from microcolumn agglutination method can be interfered by the residual drug antibody in MM patients, while the interference was eliminated in the presence of 0.2 mol/L DTT solution. However, no disturbance was observed when using condensed amine method or saline method. Therefore, corresponding transfusion procedures should be selected according to the emergency degree of blood transfusion to ensure the safety and timeliness of blood transfusion.
