Evolution and trends in the adoption of laparoscopic liver resection in Singapore: Analysis of 300 cases.
10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2021213
- Author:
Brian K GOH
1
;
Zhongkai WANG
;
Ye Xin KOH
;
Kai Inn LIM
Author Information
1. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Hepatectomy;
Humans;
Laparoscopy;
Length of Stay;
Liver Neoplasms/surgery*;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local;
Retrospective Studies;
Singapore/epidemiology*
- From:Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
2021;50(10):742-750
- CountrySingapore
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION:The introduction of laparoscopic surgery has changed abdominal surgery. We evaluated the evolution and changing trends associated with adoption of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and the experience of a surgeon without prior LLR experience.
METHODS:A retrospective review of 310 patients who underwent LLR performed by a single surgeon from 2011 to 2020 was conducted. Exclusion criteria were patients who underwent laparoscopic liver surgeries such as excision biopsy, local ablation, drainage of abscesses and deroofing of liver cysts. There were 300 cases and the cohort was divided into 5 groups of 60 patients.
RESULTS:There were 288 patients who underwent a totally minimally invasive approach, including 28 robotic-assisted procedures. Open conversion occurred for 13 (4.3%) patients; the conversion rate decreased significantly from 10% in the initial period to 3.3% subsequently. There were 83 (27.7%) major resections and 131 (43.7%) resections were performed for tumours in the difficult posterosuperior location. There were 152 (50.7%) patients with previous abdominal surgery, including 52 (17.3%) repeat liver resections for recurrent tumours, and 60 patients had other concomitant operations. According to the Iwate criteria, 135 (44.7%) were graded as high/expert difficulty. Major morbidity (>grade 3a) occurred in 12 (4.0%) patients and there was no 30-day mortality. Comparison across the 5 patient groups demonstrated a significant trend towards older patients, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, increasing frequency of LLR with previous abdominal surgery, increasing frequency of portal hypertension and huge tumours, decreasing blood loss and decreasing transfusion rate across the study period. Surgeon experience (≤60 cases) and Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (IMM) high grade resections were independent predictors of open conversion. Open conversion was associated with worse perioperative outcomes such as increased blood loss, transfusion rate, morbidity and length of stay.
CONCLUSION:LLR can be safely adopted for resections of all difficulty grades, including major resections and for tumours located in the difficult posterosuperior segments, with a low open conversion rate.
