Reevaluation of systematic evaluation of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non- small cell lung cancer
- VernacularTitle:吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的系统评价再评价
- Author:
Chunbi HUANG
1
;
Weiping LI
1
;
Rufu XU
1
;
Rong ZHANG
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy，the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University，Chongqing 400037，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
gemcitabine;
pemetrexed;
vinorelbine;
cisplatin;
non-small cell lung cancer;
reevaluation of systematic evaluation
- From:
China Pharmacy
2022;33(5):622-627
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To reevaluate the system atic evaluation of g emcitabine combined with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC），in order to provide evidence-based evidence for the treatment of NSCLC. METHODS Retrieved from Wanfang database ，CNKI，VIP，PubMed，Embase，systematic evaluation of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin versus pemetrexed/vinorelbine combined with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced NSCLC was included from the inception to Dec. 2021. RevMan 5.3 system evaluation software was used for meta-analysis of various outcome indicators ； AMSTAR2 scale was used for methodological quality evaluation ，and GRADE tool was used for evidence quality evaluation. RESULTS A total of 9 literatures were included. Meta-analysis showed that the effective rate of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin was significantly lower than pemetrexed combined with cisplatin ，but was similar to vinorelbine combined with cisplatin. The 1-year survival rate of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin was equivalent to that of pemetrexed combined with cisplatin ，but was superior to vinorelbine combined with cisplatin. There was no significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting between gemcitabine combined with cisplatin and pemetrexed/vinorelbine combined with cisplatin. Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin had a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia than pemetrexed/vinorelbine combined with cisplatin. The incidence of neutropenia and leukopenia in gemcitabine combined with cisplatin were higher than pemetrexed combined with cisplatin ，but were significantly lower than vinorelbine combined with cisplatin. The evaluation results of AMSTAR 2 scale showed that 6 systematic evaluation were of low quality in methodology and 3 were of very low quality. The results of the GRADE tool showed that 31％ of the outcome indicators were of medium quality （14 items），27％ were of low quality （12 items），and 42％ were of very low quality（19 items）. Research limitations and publication bias were the most frequently downgraded factors. CONCLUSIONS Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin has advantages over 154854280@qq.com vinorelbine combined with cisplatin in the efficacy and safety of ad vanced NSCLC ，especially in the 1-year survival rate ，the incidence of neutropenia and leucopenia. The efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin are inferior to those of pemetrexed combined with cisplatin. However ，the methodological quality and evidence level of systematic evaluation are not high on the whole ，and the overall quality of research needs to be improved.
