REtrospective Multicenter INdian Study of Derivo Embolization Device (REMIND): Periprocedural Safety
10.5469euroint.2021.00227
- Author:
Niranjan Prakash MAHAJAN
1
;
Mudasir MUSHTAQ
;
Amit BHATTI
;
Sukalyan PURKAYASTHA
;
Nitin DANGE
;
Mathew CHERIAN
;
Vipul GUPTA
;
Vikram HUDED
Author Information
1. Division of Interventional Neurology, Department of Neurology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Narayana Health City, Bangalore, India
- Publication Type:Original Paper
- From:Neurointervention
2021;16(3):232-239
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:The treatment of aneurysms with characteristics such as complex morphology, fusiform, blister-like, wide neck, or large size has been revolutionized with the introduction of flow diverters. Though flow diverters have several advantages over coiling, they also have certain important disadvantages such as the lack of immediate protection against rupture, the risk of ischemic stroke, the need for antiplatelet therapy, and long latency for complete effect. The Derivo Embolization Device (DED) is a second-generation self-expanding device that is claimed to be less thrombogenic than conventional devices. We retrospectively evaluated the periprocedural safety and risks associated with the DED across 5 centers in India.
Materials and Methods:This is a multicentric, retrospective, observational study of DED, conducted at 5 high volume endovascular therapy centers in India from May 2018 to June 2020. Periprocedural demographic, clinical, and angiographic data were collected from a retrospective review of patient charts.
Results:A total of 96 patients, including 56 (58.3%) females, aged between 16–80 years (60±12.7 years) harboring 106 aneurysms were studied. Seven (7.3%) were noted to harbor multiple aneurysms: 6 had 3 aneurysms each, while 1 patient had 5 aneurysms. The following aneurysm characteristics were noted: average size, 9.8±8.2 mm; average neck size, 6.9±8.5 mm; wide-necked (>4 mm), 63 (59.4%); giant (>25 mm), 8 (7.5%); and anterior circulation location, 98 (92.5%). Eighteen (17%) of these were ruptured. Additional balloon angioplasty was performed in 5 (5.2%) patients. Intraprocedural problems were encountered in 3 (3.1%), of which only 1 had clinical implications, the device fish-mouthing with stent thrombosis resulting in a malignant middle cerebral artery territory infarction. The modified Rankin scale at 3 months was worse in 1 patient.
Conclusion:DED is a newer generation flow diverter stent with a low periprocedural complication rate.
