Monitoring Radiation Doses during Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neurointerventional Procedures: Multicenter Study for Establishment of Reference Levels
10.5469euroint.2021.00437
- Author:
Yon-Kwon IHN
1
;
Bum-soo KIM
;
Hae Woong JEONG
;
Sang Hyun SUH
;
Yoo Dong WON
;
Young-Jun LEE
;
Dong Joon KIM
;
Pyong JEON
;
Chang-Woo RYU
;
Sang-il SUH
;
Dae Seob CHOI
;
See Sung CHOI
;
Sang Heum KIM
;
Jun Soo BYUN
;
Jieun RHO
;
Yunsun SONG
;
Woo Sang JEONG
;
Noah HONG
;
Sung Hyun BAIK
;
Jeong Jin PARK
;
Soo Mee LIM
;
Jung-Jae KIM
;
Woong YOON
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
- Publication Type:Original Paper
- From:Neurointervention
2021;16(3):240-251
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:To assess patient radiation doses during diagnostic and therapeutic neurointerventional procedures from multiple centers and propose dose reference level (RL).
Materials and Methods:Consecutive neurointerventional procedures, performed in 22 hospitals from December 2020 to June 2021, were retrospectively studied. We collected data from a sample of 429 diagnostic and 731 therapeutic procedures. Parameters including dose-area product (DAP), cumulative air kerma (CAK), fluoroscopic time (FT), and total number of image frames (NI) were obtained. RL were calculated as the 3rd quartiles of the distribution.
Results:Analysis of 1160 procedures from 22 hospitals confirmed the large variability in patient dose for similar procedures. RLs in terms of DAP, CAK, FT, and NI were 101.6 Gy·cm2, 711.3 mGy, 13.3 minutes, and 637 frames for cerebral angiography, 199.9 Gy·cm2, 3,458.7 mGy, 57.3 minutes, and 1,000 frames for aneurysm coiling, 225.1 Gy·cm2, 1,590 mGy, 44.7 minutes, and 800 frames for stroke thrombolysis, 412.3 Gy·cm2, 4,447.8 mGy, 99.3 minutes, and 1,621.3 frames for arteriovenous malformation (AVM) embolization, respectively. For all procedures, the results were comparable to most of those already published. Statistical analysis showed male and presence of procedural complications were significant factors in aneurysmal coiling. Male, number of passages, and procedural combined technique were significant factors in stroke thrombolysis. In AVM embolization, a significantly higher radiation dose was found in the definitive endovascular cure group.
Conclusion:Various RLs introduced in this study promote the optimization of patient doses in diagnostic and therapeutic interventional neuroradiology procedures. Proposed 3rd quartile DAP (Gy·cm2) values were 101.6 for diagnostic cerebral angiography, 199.9 for aneurysm coiling, 225.1 for stroke thrombolysis, and 412.3 for AVM embolization. Continual evolution of practices and technologies requires regular updates of RLs.
