Evaluation of Left Atrial Volumes Using Multidetector Computed Tomography: Comparison with Echocardiography.
10.3348/kjr.2010.11.3.286
- Author:
Hye Mi GWEON
1
;
Sang Jin KIM
;
Tae Hoon KIM
;
Sang Min LEE
;
Yoo Jin HONG
;
Se Joong RIM
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul 135-720, Korea. thkim1@yuhs.ac
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Comparative Study
- Keywords:
Left atrial volume;
Multidetector computed tomography;
2D and 3D measurements;
Echocardiography;
Simpson method
- MeSH:
Adult;
Aged;
Aged, 80 and over;
Atrial Function, Left;
*Cardiac Volume;
Contrast Media/diagnostic use;
Coronary Artery Disease/*radiography/ultrasonography;
Electrocardiography/methods;
Female;
Heart Atria/radiography/ultrasonography;
Humans;
Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Observer Variation;
Prospective Studies;
Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods;
Triiodobenzoic Acids/diagnostic use
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology
2010;11(3):286-294
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the relationship between the two different measurement methods for the evaluation of left atrial (LA) volume using cardiac multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and to compare the results between cardiac MDCT and echocardiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients (20 men, 15 women; mean age, 60 years) underwent cardiac MDCT angiography for coronary artery disease. The LA volumes were measured using two different methods: the two dimensional (2D) length-based (LB) method measured along the three-orthogonal planes of the LA and the 3D volumetric threshold-based (VTB) method measured according to the threshold 3D segmentation of the LA. The results obtained by cardiac MDCT were compared with those obtained by echocardiography. RESULTS: The LA end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes (LAESV and LAEDV) measured by the 2D-LB method correlated well with those measured by the 3D-VTB method using cardiac MDCT (r = 0.763, r = 0.786, p = 0.001). However, there was a significant difference in the LAESVs between the two measurement methods using cardiac MDCT (p < 0.05). The LAESV measured by cardiac MDCT correlated well with measurements by echocardiography (r = 0.864, p = 0.001), however with a significant difference (p < 0.01) in their volumes. The cardiac MDCT overestimated the LAESV by 22% compared to measurements by echocardiography. CONCLUSION: A significant correlation was found between the two different measurement methods for evaluating LA volumes by cardiac MDCT. Further, cardiac MDCT correlates well with echocardiography in evaluating the LA volume. However, there are significant differences in the LAESV between the two measurement methods using cardiac MDCT and between cardiac MDCT and echocardiography.
