Cognitive and Psychological Characteristics of Psychiatric Patients with Military Service Eligibility Issues
10.22722/KJPM.2019.27.2.119
- Author:
Jisoo NAM
1
;
Junho CHOI
;
Eunkyeong KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Psychiatry, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea. aidaworld@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
2019;27(2):119-129
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES:The purpose of this study was to examine cognitive and psychological characteristics of patients who visited psychiatric outpatient clinic with military service suitability issues.
METHODS:Since January, 2017 to September, 2018, patients were recruited from the department of psychiatry of university hospital. Participants were diagnosed using DSM-5 criteria by board certified psychiatrists. And each of participants tested with K-WAIS-IV, K-SCL-95 by clinical psychologist. The data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0.
RESULTS:The results indicated 24.6% of the patients have significantly low level of intellectual functioning. and 10.8% of the patients have borderline level of intellectual functioning, and 26.3% of them were below average. The results of psychological characteristics showed patients have cautious and potentially dangerous level of depression, anxiety, agoraphobia, and suicidal idea. And PTSD subscale's mean score was above problematic level. Next, we divided patients into two groups based on question of whether the patient is eligible to serve in the military service or not arises from recruitment process or army training center. But two group didn't differ significantly. And for further analyses, we also divided patients into two groups based on if they got single psychiatric diagnosis or more than one psychiatric diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS:The results indicated that group which has coexisting psychiatric disorders were more depressed, had higher level of anger and aggression, and had more serious levels of suicidal ideas than single psychiatric diagnosis group. The implications and limitations were discussed along with some suggestions for the future studies.
