Perspectives on Adopting the Guideline for Multi-regional Clinical Trials in Korea: A Multi-stakeholder Survey
10.24304/kjcp.2019.29.4.267
- Author:
Minji SOHN
1
;
Yun Kyoung SONG
;
Ah Young JEON
;
Jung Mi OH
;
In Wha KIM
Author Information
1. College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea. iwkim@snu.ac.kr, jmoh@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
2019;29(4):267-277
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:With the globalization of drug development, multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) have emerged to facilitate rapid availability of medicines to patients worldwide. The present study aimed to has explored attitudes and perceptions towards adopting the Korean MRCT guideline.
METHODS:An online survey, consisting of 16 questions, classified into two subjects, was administered to stakeholders in Korea. Most quantitative components were measured using the Likert scales. A content analysis of the qualitative components was carried out to identify the keywords in open-ended responses.
RESULTS:A total of 94 survey responses were analyzed: 51 participants from pharmaceutical companies, 11 from clinical research organizations, and 21 from clinical trial centers. The content of the guideline was rated as appropriate for clarity, acceptability, and applicability (96.8, 96.8, and 93.6%, respectively). The local environmental impact of the systemic/political, academic/technical, and industrial/economical aspects of the guideline was rated as appropriate at 95.7, 97.9, and 91.5%, respectively. The suggested adoption period was 1~2 years (40, 42.6%). The concept and individuals' domestic circumstances were the key problems affecting the clarity, applicability, and local environmental impact of the guideline.
CONCLUSION:The Korean MRCT guideline was well-developed. Their overall impact on the local environmental impact of MRCTs in Korea was expected to be beneficial, but methods are needed to minimize the negative impacts. The findings of this study can inform the priorities for the future adoption of the guideline in Korea.
