Comparison of postoperative paresthesia after sagittal split osteotomy among different fixation methods: a one year follow-up study
10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.4.215
- Author:
Reza TABRIZI
1
;
Kousha BAKRANI
;
Farshid BASTAMI
Author Information
1. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. farshidbastami@sbmu.ac.ir
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
2019;45(4):215-219
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES:Postoperative paresthesia is a common complication after sagittal split osteotomy (SSO). This study aimed to compare paresthesia among different fixation methods one year postoperative.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:This prospective cohort study assessed subjects in four groups: class II with miniplate fixation (Group 1), class II with three-screw fixation (Group 2), class III with miniplate fixation (Group 3), and class III with three-screw fixation (Group 4). Paresthesia was evaluated one year postoperative based on a 0-10 visual analogue scale. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate associations of age and mandibular movement with paresthesia. ANOVA was used to compare paresthesia among groups.
RESULTS:A total of 80 subjects were enrolled, with 20 subjects in each of the four groups. The Pearson correlation test demonstrated a significant correlation between mandibular movement and paresthesia (P=0.001). Comparison of paresthesia among the groups showed significant differences among groups 1 and 2, 2 and 3, and 3 and 4 (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:The three-screw fixation method led to more paresthesia one year postoperative compared with miniplate fixation. In addition, the magnitude of mandibular movement had a positive correlation with paresthesia.