Proposal for a New Score: Hemorrhoidal Bleeding Score
- Author:
Nadia FATHALLAH
1
;
Hélène BEAUSSIER
;
Gilles CHATELLIER
;
Jean MEYER
;
Marc SAPOVAL
;
Nadia MOUSSA
;
Vincent DE PARADES
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Annals of Coloproctology 2021;37(5):311-317
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:We conducted a prospective study to evaluate a new hemorrhoidal bleeding score (HBS).
Methods:All consecutive patients who had consulted between May 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017 for bleeding hemorrhoidal disease were prospectively assessed at a proctological department. The study was conducted in 2 stages. The first stage assessed the validity of the score on a prospective patient cohort. A second stage assessed the interobserver reproducibility of the score on another prospective cohort.
Results:One hundred consecutive patients were studied (57 males; mean age, 49.70 years). A positive association between HBS and surgery indication was found (P<0.001). A cut-off value of the score of 5 (≤5 vs. >5) separated patients from surgical to medical-instrumental treatment with a sensitivity and specificity of 75.00% and 81.25%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, only HBS was significantly associated with the operative decision (odds ratio, 12.22). Prolapse was no longer significantly associated with the surgical indication. After a mean follow-up after treatment of 7 months, HBS improved statistically significantly (P<0.0001). For the reproducibility of the score, an additional 30 consecutive patients (13 males; mean age, 53.14 years) were enrolled with an excellent agreement between 2 proctologists (kappa=0.983).
Conclusion:HBS is sensitive, specific, and reproducible. It can assess the severity of hemorrhoidal bleeding. It can discriminate between the most severe surgery-indicated patients and does so in a more efficient way than the Goligher prolapse score. It also allows quantifying the extent of change in hemorrhoidal bleeding after treatment.
