Clinical effect of stromal vascular fraction gel injection on local rhinoplasty
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0290.2021.02.008
- VernacularTitle:血管基质片段凝胶注射在隆鼻术的临床效果
- Author:
Dongyue LI
1
;
Zhaohui ZHAI
;
Tao CHEN
;
Chun＇an QU
;
Xin ZHANG
;
Shengjian TANG
Author Information
1. 潍坊医学院整形外科医院整形外科，山东潍坊 261042
- Keywords:
Nose;
Injectons;
Stromal vascular fraction gel;
Autologous fat transplantation;
Nose augmentation by injection;
Clinical effect
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology
2021;27(2):104-108
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the application and clinical effect of stromal vascular fraction gel (SVF-gel) in local rhinoplasty.Methods:A total of 84 patients with mild nasal root and low bridge were divided into observation group and control group. In the observation group, liposuction with SVF gel extraction plus injection rhinoplasty was carried out; in the control group, liposuction plus injection rhinoplasty was carried out according to the height change of nasal root and bridge, the change of nasal frontal angle, the occurrence of complications and the satisfaction of patients after operation.Results:The 84 patients were followed up for 2 weeks to 24 months. The height of nasal root and bridge increased significantly and the lines were more harmonious. The absorption of the observation group was much lower than that of control group. Except 3 patients in the observation group and 8 patients in the control group, there were different degrees of absorption within 6 months after operation. All patients did not have complications such as fat liquefaction, necrosis, induration and infection in the injection area. Three patients in the observation group were satisfied with the results after reinjection, and one patient in the control group was satisfied with the results after reinjection, three patients were not satisfied with the results, and four patients were satisfied with the prosthesis augmentation rhinoplasty. In the observation group, there were 37 cases of excellent satisfaction, 5 cases of good satisfaction, and the overall satisfaction was 100%; in the control group, there were 20 cases of excellent satisfaction, 15 cases of good satisfaction, 7 cases of bad satisfaction, and the satisfaction was 83.3%. The former was better than the latter.Conclusions:In view of superiorities such as lower complications with long-lasting effect, high fat survival rate and high satisfaction in local augmentation rhinoplasty, SVF-gel injection is especially suitable for patients who cannot accept autologous bone, prosthesis and allograft tissue filler for augmentation rhinoplasty.
