Analysis of related factors for undertaking the NSFC project among faculties with master and doctor degrees in a tertiary hospital
10.3760/cma.j.cn113565-20201208-00366
- VernacularTitle:某三甲医院硕博士人员国家自然科学基金项目承担情况的相关因素分析
- Author:
Wenting LUO
1
;
Yijia CAI
;
Minqiang LIN
Author Information
1. 厦门大学附属第一医院 361001
- Keywords:
NSFC project;
Factors;
Logistic regression analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
2021;34(3):191-194
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the main related factors for undertaking the NSFC project among the in-service master and doctor in a third-grade First-class hospital in 2020.Methods:By collecting and comparing the age of the target population, the type of education and degree, SCI papers publication and experience as principal investigator of scientific research projects and other variables, the factors affecting the commitment of the NSFC project were analyzed.Results:A total of 743 feedbacks from the people with master′s degree and doctor′s degree in this survey, 69 of whom had undertaken the NSFC project (accounting for 9.3% of the total number). By the univariate analysis, age, education, age more than 55 years old, professional Dr. and academic Dr., published SCI paper publication, JCR1/JCR2/JCR3/JCR4 publication and experience as principal investigator of scientific research project should significantly improve the opportunity of undertaking the NSFC project. The multivariate analysis results show that the main factors influencing the commitment of the NSFC project are the professional Dr., the academic Dr. and having hosted projects.Conclusions:Professional or academic doctors and experience as principal investigator of scientific research projects have significant advantages in undertaking the NSFC project. Medical institutions should fully consider the advantages of different types of scientific research personnel and make clear their differences in professional fields, in order to develop more targeted programs to improve the capacity for scientific research.
