Analysis on the effect of two methods in different degrees deep sternal wound infection after undergoing cardiac surgery
10.3760/cma.j.cn112434-20200425-00222
- VernacularTitle:两种方法治疗心脏术后不同程度胸骨感染的效果分析
- Author:
Xinbin LIU
1
;
Xin WANG
;
Zhong ZHAO
;
Zhiqiang GAO
;
Liming BAO
;
Yang GAO
;
Guohua ZHANG
Author Information
1. 航天中心医院心外科，北京 100049
- Keywords:
Cardiac surgery;
Deep sternal wound infections;
Pectoralis major
- From:
Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2021;37(9):553-556
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analysis the effect of two methods of transposition of pectoralis major in different degrees deep sternal wound infection(DSWI) after undergoing cardiac surgery.Methods:128 patients with DSWI after cardiac surgery were treated, 72 were mild, and 56 were severe. 66 cases of pectoralis major muscle flap docking method(medial muscle flap docking group) and 62 cases of lateral pectoralis major muscle flap turnover method(lateral muscle flap turnover group) were implemented respectively. Drainage tube indwelling time, reoperation rate, incidence of lung infection, long-term thoracic stability and other aspects were observed to compared the treatment effect.Results:In the mild patients, the medial muscle flap docking group and the lateral muscle flap turnover group were compared( P<0.05). The postoperative hospital stay [(14.2±4.7)days vs.(17.1±3.9)days], drainage tube retention time[(6.2±1.7)h vs.(9.1±2.9)h], and reoperation rate(2.4% vs. 6.7%), the incidence of lung infection(14.3% vs. 23.3%), long-term thoracic stability[73.8%(31/42)vs.43.3%(13/30)]. In the severe patients, the medial muscle flap docking group and the lateral muscle flap turnover group were compared. The postoperative hospital stay[(24.2±7.2)days vs.(20.1±3.5)days], drainage tube retention time[(20.2±6.6)h vs.(13.2±3.1)h], reoperation rate(20.8% vs.12.5%), incidence of pulmonary infection(41.7% vs. 31.3%), long-term thoracic stability[25.0%(6/24)vs.68.8%(22/32)]. The differences of the indicators in each group were significant , P<0.05. In the mild group, each index of the pectoralis major medial muscle flap docking method was superior to the lateral muscle flap turnover method, but the treatment results of the two methods in the severe group were opposite. Conclusion:Patients with mild deep DSWI treated with medial pectoralis major muscle flap docking and suture have less hospital stay, less reoperation rate, less complications and better treatment effect than reverse lateral pectoralis major muscle flap turnover. But the two treatments in the severe DSWI have the opposite effect.
