Efficacy and safety of the combination of agomelatine and low-dose olanzapine in 184 cases of postprandial distress syndrome with depression, anxiety and sleep disorders
10.3760/cma.j.cn311367-20210325-00183
- VernacularTitle:阿戈美拉汀联合低剂量奥氮平对184例伴抑郁、焦虑和睡眠障碍的餐后不适综合征的疗效和安全性
- Author:
Xin WANG
1
;
Yiming CHEN
;
Ling LIANG
;
Ying LI
;
Junjie HOU
;
Wei ZHAO
;
Shu LI
;
Jie ZHANG
;
Shuai SU
;
Yuming WANG
;
Bangmao WANG
Author Information
1. 天津医科大学总医院消化内科 天津市消化病研究所 300052
- Keywords:
Postprandial distress syndrome;
Agomelatine;
Olanzapine;
Depression;
Anxiety;
Sleep disorders
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestion
2021;41(9):593-598
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the efficacy and safety of the combination of agomelatine and low-dose olanzapine (AO) in the treatment of postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) with depression, anxiety and sleep disorders.Methods:From April 2019 to September 2020, PDS patients with depression, anxiety and sleep disorders in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital were selected and divided into AO group and flupentixol-melitracen (FM) group. Patients of the AO group were given oral agomelatine 25 mg and AO 1.70 mg (both once per day), and the patients of FM group were given oral FM 10.5 mg (once per day), and all patients took itopride 50 mg (three times per day) at the same time. The total treatment course was eight weeks. Nepean dyspepsia index-symptom (NDIS), patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) were used to evaluate the gastrointestinal symptoms, depression, anxiety and sleep disorders before treatment and two, four and eight weeks after treatment, respectively. The efficacy was evaluated according to the changes of scores of gastrointestinal symptoms before and after treatment. The adverse effects after medication were recorded. Independent sample t test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results:A total of 184 PDS patients with depression, anxiety and sleep disorders were enrolled, including 98 patients in AO group and 86 patients in FM group. At two, four and eight weeks after treatment, NDIS, PHQ-9, GAD-7 and PSQI scores of AO group and FM group were all lower than those of each group before treatment (AO group: 13.73±0.53, 10.13±0.44 and 7.87±0.31 vs. 27.08±0.84; 6.04±0.35, 4.70±0.31 and 3.81±0.22 vs. 10.04±0.50; 6.36±0.30, 5.29±0.28 and 4.21±0.19 vs. 10.71±0.51; 6.64±0.37, 5.27±0.35 and 4.09±0.30 vs. 11.14±0.42; FM group: 15.33±0.58, 11.58±0.50 and 9.80±0.35 vs. 25.10±0.79; 6.79±0.35, 5.71±0.32 and 4.86±0.30 vs. 9.11±0.46; 7.27±0.31, 6.51±0.32 and 5.21±0.27 vs. 9.79±0.44; 8.01±0.33, 6.76±0.32 and 5.78±0.32 vs. 10.44±0.32), and the differences were statistically significant (AO group: tNDIS=13.470, 17.930 and 21.530, tPHQ-9=6.488, 8.991 and 11.300, tGAD-7=7.361, 9.315 and 11.031, tPSQI=7.088, 9.736 and 12.550. FM group: tNDIS=9.921, 14.400 and 17.640, tPHQ-9=4.032, 6.106 and 7.781, tGAD-7=4.638, 5.993 and 8.840, tPSQI=5.289, 8.199 and 10.310, all P<0.05). At two, four and eight weeks after treatment, NDIS, GAD-7 and PSQI scores of AO group were all lower than those of the FM group during the same period (NDIS: 13.73±0.53 vs. 15.33±0.58, 10.13±0.44 vs. 11.58±0.50, 7.87±0.31 vs. 9.80±0.35; GAD-7: 6.36±0.30 vs. 7.27±0.31, 5.29±0.28 vs. 6.51±0.32, 4.21±0.19 vs. 5.21±0.27; PSQI: 6.64±0.37 vs. 8.01±0.33, 5.27±0.35 vs. 6.76±0.32, 4.09±0.30 vs. 5.78±0.32), and the differences were statistically significant ( tNDIS=2.018, 2.225 and 4.156, tGAD-7=2.097, 2.869 and 2.536, tPSQI=1.951, 2.359 and 3.099, all P<0.05). At eight weeks after treatment, the total effective rate of the AO group was higher than that of the FM group (94.9%, 93/98 vs. 84.9%, 73/86), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=5.205, P=0.026). The incidence of adverse reactions of constipation and somnolence of the AO group were both lower than those of the FM group (2.0%, 2/98 vs. 9.3%, 8/86 and 1.0%, 1/98 vs. 8.1%, 7/86, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=4.699 and 5.582, P=0.047 and 0.027). Conclusion:AO may be a treatment option for PDS with depression, anxiety and sleep disorders.
