Application of mentorship-Leichester assessment package model in general practice teaching
10.3760/cma.j.cn114798-20210228-00184
- VernacularTitle:导师制莱斯特评估包教学模式在全科门诊教学中的应用效果分析
- Author:
Xuejuan WEI
1
;
Hao WU
;
Caiying GE
;
Hongyan JIA
;
Xiumei LIU
;
Zhili LI
;
Nina CHEN
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学北京市丰台区方庄社区卫生服务中心 100078
- Keywords:
Clinical competence;
Teaching;
General practitioners;
Leichester assessment package
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
2021;20(8):823-829
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness of mentorship-Leichester assessment package (LAP) model in general practice teaching.Methods:Sixty five-year Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) students undergoing general medicine internship from July 2020 to December 2020 were divided into study group and control group with 30 students in each group. Students in study group undertook general practice internship in Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center with the mentorship-LAP model, including group-based teaching, weekly LAP case discussion and mentor-intern individualized LAP clinical practice teaching; students in control group undertook general practice internship in other community teaching bases with the traditional clinical practice training methods. After one month, students were evaluated with LAP score sheet and the evaluation results were compared between two groups.Results:After one month of training, the scores of medical history collection, physical examination, problem solving, patient management, doctor-patient relationship, expected care and medical records in both groups increased compared with pre-training (the control group: t=4.23, 5.06, 8.94, 4.85, 3.99, 1.04, 5.13, study group: t=1.86, 2.85, 12.42, 13.61, 6.29, 4.83, 5.63, all P<0.05). The scores of medical history collection, physical examination, problem solving, patient management, doctor-patient relationship, and expected care after training in the study group were higher than those in the control group ( t=5.66, 2.83, 5.67, 8.13, 2.76, 2.52, all P<0.05). After the training, in the medical history collection items, the scores of patient-centered communication, RICE recognition, and physical-psychological-social factors in study group were higher than those in the control group ( t=5.66, 7.35 and 2.66, all P<0.05); in the problem-solving items, the scores of clinical data application, comprehensive analysis ability and personal ability limitation in study group were higher than those in the control group ( t=4.32, 3.38 and 2.26, all P<0.05); in the patient management items, the scores of overall management plans, doctor-patient collaboration, dispelling doubts, subsequent visits/follow-up, and the degree of patient understanding the management plan in the study group were higher than those in the control group ( t=3.03, 2.07, 2.43, 3.15 and 2.17, all P<0.05). Conclusion:The mentorship-LAP teaching model is helpful to improve the effectiveness of general practice internship for medicine students.
