The Difference in Comorbidities and Behavioral Aspects between Internet Abuse and Internet Dependence in Korean Male Adolescents.
- Author:
June Young LEE
1
;
E Jin PARK
;
Min KWON
;
Ji Hye CHOI
;
Jo Eun JEONG
;
Jung Seok CHOI
;
Sam Wook CHOI
;
Chang Uk LEE
;
Dai Jin KIM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Internet abuse; Dependence; Comorbidity; Behavioral aspects
- MeSH: Adolescent*; Anxiety; Comorbidity*; Depression; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Humans; Internet*; Male; Mood Disorders; Psychiatry; Surveys and Questionnaires; Seoul
- From:Psychiatry Investigation 2014;11(4):387-393
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This study examined the differences in psychiatric comorbidities and behavioral aspects in accordance with the severity of Internet addiction in male adolescents. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five adolescents from four middle and high schools in Seoul were enrolled in this study. The subjects were divided into non-addict, abuse, and dependence groups according to a diagnostic interview by psychiatrists. The psychiatric comorbidities and behavioral aspects of subjects were evaluated through psychiatric clinical interviews based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edition), the Children's Depression Inventory, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Internet Addiction Test, and a self-reported questionnaire about behavioral aspects. RESULTS: The psychiatric comorbidity distributions were significantly different in the abuse and dependence groups, particularly in terms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and mood disorder items. The Children's Depression Inventory, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the Internet Addiction Test scores were also significantly different among the three groups. There were significant differences in 10 of the 20 items of the Internet Addiction Test between the non-addict, abuse, and dependence groups. There were significant differences in seven items between the non-addict and abuse groups, but no differences between subjects in the abuse and dependence groups. Significant differences were observed in three items between the abuse and dependence groups, but there were no significant differences between the non-addict and abuse groups. In terms of behavioral aspects, scores for abusive, sexual, and decreased social interest behaviors were highest in the dependence group, and lowest in the non-addict group. However, the behavioral aspects of decreased interpersonal relationships did not show this difference between groups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that there are differences in psychiatric comorbidities and behavioral aspects between adolescent males with characteristics of Internet abuse and Internet dependence.
