Non-contact bridging periprosthetic plate on treatment of re-fracture around the nail after intramedullary fixation on intertrochanteric fracture
10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20210207-00149
- VernacularTitle:非接触桥接假体周围骨折钢板固定治疗转子间骨折髓内固定术后钉体周围骨折
- Author:
Yuxi SUN
1
;
Wei TIAN
;
Zhaojie LIU
;
Haotian QI
;
Hongchuan WANG
;
Xin JIN
;
Jian JIA
Author Information
1. 天津市天津医院创伤骨盆科 300211
- Keywords:
Femoral fractures;
Fracture fixation, intramedullary;
Internal fixators
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2021;41(21):1553-1560
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of MIPO combined with non-contact bridging periprosthesis fracture plate (NCB.PP) in the treatment of re-fracture around the nail after intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fracture.Methods:From October 2015 to January 2020, 12 patients with re-fracture around the nail after intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fracture were treated in our hospital. There were 7 males and 5 females with an average age of 74.88±12.1 years (range, 65-83 years old); 8 patients on the left side and 4 patients on the right side received short nail of proximal femoral nail (PFN), 6-36 months after operation, they fell down and caused closed fracture around the nail body. According to Vancouver classification system, all the patients were Vancouver type B; preoperative bone mineral density examination showed that 1 case had normal bone mass, 10 cases had osteoporosis, and 1 case had low bone mass. All patients were treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique for reduction and fixation, and fixed with proximal femur NCB.PP. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris hip score at 1 day, 3 months and the last follow-up were compared.Results:The average operation time was 68.7±4.33 min (range, 65-75 min); the average intraoperative blood loss was 291.67±114.48 ml (range, 150-400 ml); the average postoperative drainage volume was 79.17±17.17 ml (range, 50-100 ml). After fracture reduction, all patients were able to obtain 2-5 bicortical screws fixation, with an average of 3.25±0.96. Among them, 3 cases were fixed with additional binding straps; 3 cases underwent autologous iliac bone grafting during the operation. All cases were followed up for 9-60 months, with an average of 16 months. At the last follow-up, 10 patients had fracture healing, the healing time was 7.75±2.83 months (range, 4-13 months), and the fracture healing rate was 83.3% (10/12). Among the other two patients, one was an 83 years old patient with severe osteoporosis, who was bedridden after operation and remained unhealed after 12 months of follow-up; a 68 years old patient had bone restoration at the broken end of the fracture 6 months after operation. The second operation was performed. Iliac combined with allogeneic bone graft was taken from the broken end. At the end of 13 months after operation, the fracture was partially healed. The VAS at one week, three months and the last follow-up were 8.00 (8.00, 9.00), 2.50 (2.00, 3.00) and 0.00 (0.00, 0.75), respectively. There were significant differences in VAS scores between 1 week after operation and 3 months after operation, 1 week after operation and the last follow-up, and 3 months after operation and the last follow-up ( Z=-3.129, -3.097, -3.134, all P < 0.05). The Harris scores at 3 months after operation and at the last follow-up were 72.50±2.91 and 86.67±5.30 respectively. After statistical analysis, the difference was statistically significant ( t=8.857, P< 0.001). At the last follow-up, except for 1 case of fracture nonunion and 1 case of reoperation, the Harris score of hip joint of the other 10 patients was excellent in 6 cases and good in 4 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 83.3% (10/12). One case of superficial wound infection was healed by intravenous drip of sensitive antibiotics. One patient had incision fat liquefaction and was given local dressing change to heal the incision. Conclusion:MIPO combined proximal femoral NCB.PP in the treatment of re-fracture around the nail after intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fracture has the advantage of less surgical damage, less blood loss, higher healing rate, and it can obtain satisfactory short and medium-term clinical efficacy.
