Discussion on the timing of sequential LC for acute cholecystitis after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder puncture and drainage
10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20210420-00143
- VernacularTitle:经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术后序贯行LC治疗急性胆囊炎手术时机的探讨
- Author:
Liming SONG
1
;
Xuemin LI
;
Pengsheng YANG
Author Information
1. 郑州大学附属郑州中心医院肝胆胰外科，郑州 450000
- Keywords:
Cholecystitis, acute;
Cholecystectomy, laparoscopic;
Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
2021;27(10):753-756
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To study the optimal surgical timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) for acute cholecystitis.Methods:A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of patients with acute cholecystitis who were treated at Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University from April 2016 to October 2020 with initial PTGBD followed by LC. These patients were divided into three groups according to the time intervals between LC with PTGBD. Patients who underwent LC 3~4 weeks after PTGBD were in the short interval group ( n=67); patients who underwent LC 5~8 weeks after PTGBD were in the intermediate interval group ( n=78); and patients who underwent LC>8 weeks after PTGBD were in the long interval group ( n=73). The baseline and perioperative data of the three groups were compared. Results:In 218 patients, 97 were males and 121 were females, aged (72.1±8.4) years. Before LC, the gallbladder wall in the short interval group (4.77±0.62) mm was significantly thicker than that in the intermediate interval group (3.85±0.34) mm and the long interval group (3.81±0.25) mm (all P<0.05). Intraoperative blood loss in the intermediate interval group was significantly less than that in the short interval group ( P<0.05). The operation time, conversion to laparotomy, placement of drainage tube, postoperative hospital stay and total hospitalization expenses in the intermediate interval group were significantly better than those in the other two groups (all P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the intermediate interval group was significantly lower than that in the short interval group [2.56% (2/78) vs. 14.93% (10/67)], and the long interval group [2.56% (2/78) vs. 12.33% (9/73), all P<0.05]. Conclusion:The best timing for sequential LC after PTGBD in acute cholecystitis was shown in this study to be 5 to 8 weeks after PTGBD.
