Tolerance and dosimetric study of multi-leaf collimator leaf position accuracy for dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy
10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20200811-00414
- VernacularTitle:动态多叶准直器精度对调强放疗的剂量学影响和容差研究
- Author:
Jiming YANG
1
;
Min MA
;
Yong WU
;
Jiangping REN
Author Information
1. 宁波市第一医院放化疗中心 315000
- Keywords:
Dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy;
Multi-leaf collimator;
Quality control accuracy;
Systematic error;
Random error
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
2021;30(11):1167-1172
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the dosimetric effect of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) position error on dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (dMLC-IMRT), aiming to provide guidance for the establishment of MLC quality control accuracy and operation tolerance.Methods:In the phantom study, the virtual water phantom established in the treatment planning system (TPS), and three dynamic sliding window test fields with gap width of 5 mm, 10 mm and 20 mm were designed. Clinical treatment plans of 7 common tumor types were extracted, including nasopharyngeal carcinoma, glioma, lung cancer, esophageal cancer, cervical cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer, with 6 cases in each. MLC errors were introduced into the copy from original plan to generate the simulation plans. MLC errors included systematic open/close error, systematic deviation error and random error. The dosimetric differences between the original and simulation plans were compared.Results:The phantom study showed that the symbol of dose deviation was the same as that of systematic open/close error, and the value was increased with the increase of MLC error and decreased with the increase of gap width. The results of patient study showed that the systematic open/close error had a significant effect on dosimetry, the target volume dose sensitivities of different plans were 7.258-13.743%/mm, and were negatively correlated with the average field width. The dosimetric deviation caused by the systematic shift error below 2 mm was less than 2%. The dosimetric change caused by the random error below 2 mm could be neglected in clinical treatment.Conclusions:The minimal gap width should be limited in TPS, whereas the quality control of MLC should be strengthened. In addition, for the dynamic intensity-modulated treatment technology, 2 mm random error was suggested to be the operation tolerance during treatment delivery, and 0.2 mm alignment accuracy on each side (or 0.4 mm unilateral) is recommended to be the MLC quality control accuracy to ensure the dose accuracy of radiotherapy for different tumors.
