Meta-analysis of dosimetric comparison between volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for breast cancer after modified radical mastectomy
10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20200818-00429
- VernacularTitle:乳腺癌改良根治术后容积调强弧形治疗与调强放疗剂量比较的 Meta分析
- Author:
Yan GAO
1
;
Heli ZHONG
;
Zhuangling LI
;
Guangwei ZHANG
;
Longxing LI
;
Yabin SHI
;
Xianming LI
Author Information
1. 深圳市人民医院（暨南大学第二临床医学院，南方科技大学第一附属医院）肿瘤放疗科 518020
- Keywords:
Breast neoplasm/volumetric-modulated arc therapy;
Breast neoplasm/intensity-modulated radiotherapy;
Meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
2021;30(11):1159-1166
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the dosimetric differences between volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) on planning target volume (PTV) and organ-at-risk (OAR) for breast cancer after modified radical mastectomy, aiming to provide evidence-based reference for clinical practice.Methods:According to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, FMRS, CNKI, Wanfang Data and VIP full text databases from the inception of databases up to March 2020. The controlled clinical trials of dosimetric comparison between VMAT and IMRT for breast cancer following modified radical mastectomy were selected. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata14 software.Results:The meta-analysis included 281 patients from 13 observational studies. Compared with IMRT, VMAT significantly increased the PTV dose coverage D 95%( P<0.001) and significantly improved the PTV homogeneity index (HI, P<0.001) and conformity index (CI, P=0.004). Compared with IMRT, VMAT more effectively decreased the ipsilateral lung V 20Gy (WMD=1.332, P=0.027) and contralateral lung V 10Gy ( P=0.003). There were no significant differences in theD mean, V 5Gy, V 10Gy and V 30Gy of the ipsilateral lung, D mean and V 5Gy of the contralateral lung, D mean, V 10Gy and V 30Gy of the heart between VMAT and IMRT (all P>0.05). Compared with VMAT, IMRT reduced the cardiac V 5Gy ( P=0.001). However, sensitivity analysis of included literature on cardiac V 5Gy showed that the P value was reversed, indicating that the stability of the results was poor. VMAT significantly shortened the delivery time ( P<0.001) and the number of monitor units ( P<0.001) compared to IMRT. Conclusion:Compared with IMRT, VMAT can achieves superior target dose coverage, HI and CI, better protection for the ipsilateral and contralateral lung, fewer monitor units and shorter delivery time.
