Stick supporting reposition used to treat irreducible intertrochanteric fractures
10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20210712-00334
- VernacularTitle:顶棒支撑法复位在难复性股骨转子间骨折治疗中的应用效果分析
- Author:
Fengpo SUN
1
;
Xiangxue LIU
;
Tongyi ZHANG
;
Junchuan LIU
;
Ze ZHANG
;
Quan JI
;
Liangyuan WEN
Author Information
1. 北京医院骨科，国家老年医学中心，中国医学科学院老年医学研究院 100730
- Keywords:
Hip fractures;
Fracture fixation, internal;
Reduction;
Stick supporting;
Aged
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2021;23(9):782-787
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate our self-designed stick supporting reposition which was used to treat irreducible intertrochanteric fractures.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted of the 138 patients with irreducible intertrochanteric fracture (an observational group) who had been treated by stick supporting reposition followed by intramedullary nailing at Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Hospital between April 2015 and December 2019. They were 45 males and 93 females with an age of (79.9±8.2) years; by AO classification, there were 25 cases of type 31-A1, 98 cases of type 31-A2 and 15 cases of type 31-A3. The other 142 patients with irreducible intertrochanteric fracture were included as a control group who had been treated by open or limited open reduction and intramedullary nailing between January 2010 and March 2015. The 2 groups were compared in terms of reduction time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, reduction quality, fracture union time and complications.Results:The 2 groups were comparable because there was no significant difference between them in preoperative general data or follow-up time ( P>0.05). The reduction time [(12.0±3.4) min], operation time [(64.1±6.5) min], and intraoperative blood loss [(228.0±40.0) mL] in the observational group were significantly less than those in the control group [(18.3±8.9) min, (72.3±11.2) min and (319.1±95.0) mL] ( P<0.05). The reduction quality in the observational group (82 excellent and 56 acceptable cases) was significantly better than that in the control group (63 excellent, 65 acceptable and 14 poor cases) ( P<0.05). The fracture union time for the observational group [(3.8±0.9) months] was significantly shorter than that for the control group [(4.0±0.9) months] ( P>0.05). There were 6 cases of internal fixation failure and 8 cases of hip varus deformity in the control group, but no such complications occurred in the observational group. Conclusion:In the treatment of irreducible intertrochanteric fractures, compared with open or limited open reduction, our stick supporting reposition may shorten operation time, reduce intraoperative blood loss and improve quality of fracture reduction.
