Effect of perioperative whole-course closed-loop temperature management system in the prevention of hypothermia in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture
10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20210506-00284
- VernacularTitle:围术期全程闭环体温管理系统预防老年股骨颈骨折患者低体温的效果
- Author:
Dongyu ZHANG
1
;
Qi FENG
;
Changhui SHAO
;
Weiyan HUANG
;
Shan OU
Author Information
1. 成都中医药大学临床医学院 610075
- Keywords:
Aged;
Femoral neck fractures;
Hypothermia;
Perioperative period;
Whole-course closed-loop temperature management
- From:
Chinese Journal of Trauma
2021;37(12):1119-1125
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effect of perioperative whole-course closed-loop temperature management system for prevention of hypothermia in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.Methods:A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 120 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture admitted to Chengdu First People's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2020. There were 48 males and 72 females, aged 60-79 years［（68.3±5.0）years］. All patients underwent total hip arthroplasty. Heat warming with the whole-course closed-loop temperature management system was applied in 40 patients（closed-loop group）, with the medical heating mattress in 40 patients（heat preservation group）, and with the quilt in 40 patients（control group）. The core body temperature of the three groups was recorded 8 minutes after wearing the temperature sensor（T0）, immediately after induction of anesthesia（T1）, 30 minutes after induction of anesthesia（T2）, 60 minutes after induction of anesthesia（T3）, at the end of surgery（T4）, and 20 minutes after entering the postanesthesia care unit（PACU）（T5）. The thrombin time（TT）, prothrombin time（PT）and activated partial thromboplastin time（APTT）were compared among groups before operation and at T4. The incidence of intraoperative hypothermia, incidence of shivering during PACU, incidence of surgical site infection, extubation time（from the day of drug withdrawal to the time of tracheal tube removal）, length of hospital stay（from the day of operation to the time of discharge）and adverse reactions related to the devices were compared among groups.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in core body temperature among three groups at T0（ P>0.05）. The core body temperature in closed-loop group［（36.61±0.28）℃］was higher than that in heat preservation group［（36.45±0.28）℃］and control group［（36.44±0.27）℃］at T1（ P<0.05）, but no statistically significant difference was found in core body temperature between heat preservation group and control group（ P>0.05）. The core body temperature in closed-loop group［（36.46±0.28）℃,（36.40±0.30）℃,（36.45±0.37）℃,（36.50±0.27）℃］was higher than that in heat preservation group［（36.32±0.31）℃,（36.24±0.26）℃,（36.28±0.30）℃,（36.24±0.31）℃］and control group［（36.12±0.30）℃,（35.98±0.28）℃,（35.73±0.31）℃,（35.81±0.32）℃］at T2-T5（ P<0.05）, and a higher temperature was found in heat preservation group than control group（ P<0.05）. The core body temperature in closed-loop group was increased at T1 compared to that at T0（ P<0.05）, while there was no statistical difference at T0 and T1 in heat preservation group and control group（ P>0.05）. The core body temperature in closed-loop group showed no significant difference at T2-T5 and T0（ P>0.05）, while the core temperature in heat preservation group and control group was decreased at T2-T5 compared to that at T0（ P<0.05）. The core body temperature in closed-loop group was within the set target temperature range. There was no statistically significant difference in TT, PT and APTT among the three groups before operation（ P>0.05）. At T4, the levels of TT, PT and APTT in closed-loop group［（18.9±1.7）seconds,（11.9±0.7）seconds,（35.5±3.3）seconds］and heat preservation group［（18.8±1.7）seconds,（11.6±0.8）seconds,（32.8±2.7）seconds］were shorter than those in control group［（20.9±1.3）seconds,（13.0±0.8）seconds,（35.7±3.4）seconds］（ P<0.05）. At T4, the levels of APTT in closed-loop group and heat preservation group were longer than those before operation（ P<0.05）. At T4, the levels of TT, PT and APTT in control group were longer than those before operation（ P<0.05）. There was no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypothermia or shivering during PACU between closed-loop group［18%（7/40）, 3%（1/40）］and heat preservation group［33%（13/40）, 8%（3/40）］（ P>0.05）, which were lower than those in control group［75%（30/40）, 33%（13/40）］（ P<0.05）. There was no significant difference in the extubation time between closed-loop group［（12.5±3.6）minutes］and heat preservation group［（13.2±3.9）minutes］（ P>0.05）, which was shorter than that in control group［（16.6±4.0）minutes］（ P<0.05）. The incidence of surgical site infection and length of hospital stay were statistically insignificant among the three groups（ P>0.05）. No adverse reactions such as allergic reaction or pressure ulcers occurred in the three groups. Conclusion:For the elderly patients with femoral neck fracture, the perioperative whole-course closed-loop temperature management system can effectively maintain the core body temperature, improve coagulation function, prevent hypothermia, reduce shivering and shorten the extubation time, without increasing the risk of other adverse events, so the system can be safely used in clinical practice.
