Resuscitation aortic balloon occlusion and resuscitation thoracotomy in the treatment of non- compressible torso hemorrhage: a Meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20210426-00267
- VernacularTitle:复苏性主动脉球囊阻断术与复苏性剖胸术治疗不可压迫性躯干出血预后的Meta分析
- Author:
Honghao HUANG
1
;
Ke YANG
;
Xiqiang WU
;
Song WU
;
Jian LIU
;
Jinbao ZHANG
Author Information
1. 西南交通大学医学院，成都 610031
- Keywords:
Catheterization;
Balloon occlusion;
Thoracotomy;
Shock, traumatic;
Meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Trauma
2021;37(12):1112-1118
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To systematically compare the prognosis in non-compressible torso hemorrhage（NCTH）treated by resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta（REBOA）and resuscitation thoracotomy（RT）.Methods:Data were searched form MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, WanFang, CNKI and VIP databases to collect studies on the prognosis of patients with NCTH undergone REBOA and RT from inception to December 2020. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and evaluated the quality of the included studies. The Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.3. The patients were divided into REBOA group and RT group according to the different surgical treatment methods on admission, and the prognosis of each group was evaluated. The difference of mortality rate, reoperation rate of laparotomy after operation, reoperation rate of embolization after operation and mortality rate in different operating room area were compared between the two groups. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger test.Results:A total of 2 prospective studies and 4 retrospective studies involving 2, 588 subjects were included. There were 1, 591 patients in REBOA group and 997 patients in RT group. Significant differences were observed in the mortality rate（ I2=68%, OR=0.33, 95% CI 0.26-0.42, P<0.01）, reoperation rate of laparotomy after operation（ I2=76%, OR=1.41, 95% CI 1.11-1.77, P<0.01）and reoperation rate of embolization after operation（ I2=84%, OR=0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.99, P<0.05）between REBOA group and RT group. Subgroup analysis showed that the mortality rate in the ICU were not statistically different between the two groups（ I2=83%, OR=0.69, 95% CI 0.45-1.05, P>0.05）, but the mortality rate in the emergency room was lower in REBOA group than that in RT group（ I2=94%, OR=0.52, 95% CI 0.38-0.70, P<0.01）. Egger test showed that publication bias had little effect on the results. Conclusions:For patients with NCTH, REBOA can reduce the mortality rate and reoperation rate of embolization after operation, but increase the reoperation rate of laparotomy after operation when compared with RT. In addition, the emergency room may be a more suitable operationg room area for REBOA.
