The efficacy of different non-drug smoking cessation interventions on smoking cessation among high-risk populations of lung cancer screening by network meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn371468-20210317-00142
- VernacularTitle:非药物戒烟干预对肺癌筛查高危人群戒烟效果的网状Meta分析
- Author:
Wan YE
1
;
Junrui WANG
;
Yuanyuan LIU
;
Xiaojuan HUA
;
Xinxin YE
Author Information
1. 厦门医学院护理学系 361023
- Keywords:
Intervention;
Non drug;
Smoking cessation;
Lung cancer screening;
Network meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
2021;30(9):850-857
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To assess the efficacy of different non-drug smoking cessation interventions on smoking cessation among the high-risk populations of lung cancer screening by network meta-analysis.Methods:PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), PsychINFO, CNKI, WanFang and VIP databases were searched for randomized controlled clinical trials published from January 2010 to September 2020.According to the eligibility criteria, the retrieval literature was screened, the quality evaluation and data extraction were conducted, then, the statistical analysis was performed by using the Stata 14.0 software.Results:A total of 28 trials were included, including 34 640 cases of high-risk population, involving intervention measures, including 5R short quit smoking intervention, cognitive behavior therapy, award model quit smoking intervention, motivational interview, network intervention, telephone intervention, incentive mechanism plus telephone intervention, network plus telephone intervention, conventional treatment and blank group.The results of network meta-analysis showed that on the 7-day follow-up of 6 months, according to the score of SUCRA, the ranking of smoking cessation rate was 5R short smoking cessation intervention (0.88), cognitive behavior therapy (0.85), AWARD model smoking cessation intervention (0.80), incentive mechanism plus telephone intervention (0.73), motivational interview (0.53), Internet plus telephone intervention (0.40), Internet intervention (0.37), telephone intervention (0.31), conventional treatment (0.13) and blank group (0.03). However, on the 7-day smoking cessation rate of 12-month follow-up, the ranking of smoking cessation rate was 5R short smoking cessation intervention (0.94), AWARD model smoking cessation intervention (0.81), motivational interview (0.51), network intervention (0.40), telephone intervention (0.19) and conventional treatment (0.14).Conclusions:The existing evidence shows that no matter the length of follow-up, 5R short smoking cessation intervention has the best effect on smoking cessation in high-risk population of lung cancer screening.
