Effect of bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on pre-attentive processing in methamphetamine addicts
10.3760/cma.j.cn371468-20210107-00014
- VernacularTitle:双侧重复经颅磁刺激对甲基苯丙胺成瘾者前注意加工的干预效果
- Author:
Meirong YANG
1
;
Mingyuan HE
;
Changming WANG
;
Shaobo LYU
;
Yinghao WEI
;
Xiaoyan WANG
;
Yang ZHAO
Author Information
1. 华北理工大学心理与精神卫生学院，唐山 063000
- Keywords:
Methamphetamine addicts;
Mismatch negative wave;
Pre-attentive processing;
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
2021;30(6):497-503
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effect of bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the pre-attentive processing of methamphetamine addicts.Methods:Forty methamphetamine addicts were screened and equally divided into the intervention group and the control group by random number table method.The intervention group was treated with bilateral simultaneous stimulation with 10 Hz on the left DLPFC and 1 Hz on the right DLPFC with 7 days of continuous intervention.The same scheme was used to intervene the control group, but with pseudo-stimulation. The changes of amplitude and latency of mismatch negative wave(MMN) before and after intervention were compared. SPSS 24.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Independent sample t-test was used for inter group comparison, and paired sample t-test was used for intra group comparison before and after intervention. Results:Before rTMS, there were no significant differences in MMN(F3, Fz, F4) amplitude (intervention group: (-0.90±0.28)μV, (-0.98±0.19)μV, (-0.96±0.19)μV; control group: (-0.92±0.21)μV, (-0.89±0.20)μV, (-0.94±0.16)μV)and latency(intervention group: (184.16±33.07)ms, (179.20±25.35)ms, (184.95±28.22)ms; control group: (184.91±26.96)ms, (180.99±25.29)ms, (181.55±23.19)ms) between the two groups (all P>0.05). After the intervention, there were significant differences in MMN(Fz, F4) amplitude(intervention group: (-1.38±0.16)μV, (-1.17±0.19)μV; control group: (-0.91±0.17) μV, (-0.99±0.16)μV) between the two groups (both P<0.01), but there were no significant differences in MMN (F3) amplitude(intervention group: (-1.01±0.59)μV; control group: (-0.80±0.50)μV), and in MMN (F3, Fz, F4) latency(intervention group: (177.38±26.45)ms, (172.17±23.87)ms, (179.84±23.60)ms; control group: (182.08±24.95)ms, (177.94±21.30)ms, (179.18±21.62)ms)between the two groups (all P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in MMN( Fz, F4) amplitude (before-intervention: (-0.98±0.19)μV, (-0.96±0.19)μV; after-intervention: (-1.38±0.16)μV, (-1.17±0.19)μV)before and after intervention in the intervention group (both P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in MMN(F3) amplitude(before-intervention: (-0.90±0.28)μV; after-intervention: (-1.01±0.59)μV)before and after intervention in the intervention group ( P>0.05), and there were statistically significant differences in MMN(F3, Fz, F4) latency (before-intervention: (184.16±33.07)ms, (179.20±25.35)ms, (184.95±28.22)ms; after-intervention: (177.38±26.45)ms, (172.17±23.87)ms, (179.84±23.60)ms)before and after intervention in the intervention group(all P<0.05). After pseudo-stimulation, there were no statistically significant differences in MMN( F3, Fz, F4) amplitude(before-intervention: (-0.92±0.21)μV, (-0.89±0.20)μV, (-0.94±0.16)μV; after-intervention: (-0.80±0.50)μV, (-0.91±0.17)μV, (-0.99±0.16)μV)and latency (before-intervention: (184.91±26.96)ms, (180.99±25.29)ms, (181.55±23.19)ms; after-intervention: (182.08±24.95)ms, (177.94±21.30)ms, (179.18±21.62)ms) before and after intervention in the control group (all P>0.05). Conclusion:After repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation, the pre-attentive processing of the intervention group is improved, which shows that bilateral simultaneous stimulation of the rTMS program is effective.
