Combination of apparent diffusion coefficient and amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram to predict the outcome of comatose patients with severe traumatic brain injury
10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200611-00462
- VernacularTitle:表观弥散系数联合振幅整合脑电图技术预测重型颅脑损伤昏迷患者的预后研究
- Author:
Chunjie SONG
1
;
Jun LI
;
Haiqing XU
;
Feng XU
;
Yinjie ZHONG
Author Information
1. 宿迁市第一人民医院神经内科，江苏宿迁 223899
- Keywords:
Severe traumatic brain injury;
Amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram;
Apparent diffusion coefficient;
Outcome
- From:
Chinese Critical Care Medicine
2021;33(5):609-612
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To examine whether the combination of quantitative regional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram (aEEG) can predict the outcome of comatose patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI).Methods:A prospective study was conducted. The patients with coma caused by sTBI [Glasgow coma scale (GCS) < 8] admitted to Suqian First Hospital from January 2016 to June 2019 were enrolled. All patients underwent aEEG examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan within 1 week after emergency treatment. The ADC values of 9 regions of interest (frontal gray matter and white matter, parietal gray matter and white matter, temporal gray matter and white matter, caudate nucleus of basal ganglia, lenticular nucleus and thalamus) were measured by head MRI, and the mean ADC values of frontal lobe, parietal lobe, temporal lobe and basal ganglia were calculated respectively. According to the follow-up results after 12 months, the differences of each index between patients with poor prognosis [Glasgow outcome score (GOS) 1-2] and patients with good prognosis (GOS 3-5) were compared; the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn to evaluate the predictive ability of aEEG and ADC for the good prognosis of patients with sTBI, and the predictive value of the combination of aEEG and ADC.Results:A total of 52 patients with sTBI were enrolled, with mean age of (36.7±13.9) years old, 35 of whom were male. Within 12 months follow-up, 29 patients had achieved favorable outcomes and 23 patients had unfavorable outcome. There were 21, 17 and 14 patients with aEEG , and grade, respectively, and 19, 10 and 0 patients had good prognosis respectively. ADC values of 9 regions of interest in patients with good prognosis were significantly higher than those in patients with poor prognosis (×10 -6 mm 2/s: 924±107 vs. 531±87 in frontal gray matter, 804±95 vs. 481±74 in frontal white matter, 831±93 vs. 683±72 in temporal gray matter, 726±87 vs. 654±63 in temporal white matter, 767±79 vs. 690±75 in parietal gray matter, 716±84 vs. 642±62 in parietal white matter, 689±70 vs. 465±68 in caudate nucleus, 723±84 vs. 587±71 in lenticular nucleus, 807±79 vs. 497±67 in thalamus, all P < 0.01). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under ROC curve (AUC) of aEEG for predicting good prognosis of sTBI patients was 0.826, when the cut-off value of aEEG was < 1.5, the sensitivity was 94.7% and the specificity was 72.8%. Among the ADC value prediction abilities in the interested areas, the prediction of ADC value in frontal lobe and basal ganglia area were better than that in sTBI patients. AUC was 0.817 and 0.903 respectively. The best cut-off values were > 726×10 -6 mm 2/s and > 624×10 -6 mm 2/s respectively, the sensitivity of predicting prognosis were both 100%, and the specificity was 63.4% and 61.8%. A model combining frontal ADC and basal ganglia ADC with aEEG was 91.0% sensitive and 93.7% specific for favorable outcome of sTBI patients. Conclusion:Combination of the quantitative measurement of regional ADC and aEEG may be useful for predicting the outcome of the patients with sTBI.
