Effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase on immune function and quality of life in patients with cerebral infarction
10.3760/cma.issn1008-6706.2021.07.010
- VernacularTitle:阿替普酶静脉溶栓对脑梗死患者免疫功能及生活质量的影响
- Author:
Hua ZHANG
1
;
Chuanguang ZHANG
;
Wenju LI
Author Information
1. 山东省,日照市中心医院神经内科 276800
- Keywords:
Brain infarction;
Thrombolytic therapy;
Tissue plasminogen activator;
Hemoperfusion;
Cerebral blood volume;
CD 8-positive T-lymphocytes;
Antigens,
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2021;28(7):1002-1005
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase on immune function and quality of life in patients with cerebral infarction.Methods:Sixty-nine patients with cerebral infarction who received treatment in Rizhao Central Hospital, China between January 2014 and January 2019 were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous thrombolysis with urokinase (control group, n = 34) or intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (observation group, n = 35). Therapeutic efficacy and cerebral blood perfusion, immune function and quality of life before and after treatment were evaluated. Results:Effective rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [82.86% (29/35) vs. 58.82% (20/34), χ2 = 4.840, P < 0.05]. After treatment, the transit time and peak time in the ischemic area in the observation group were (131.25 ± 25.41) seconds and (99.52 ± 17.50) seconds respectively, which were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(165.33 ± 31.05) seconds, (108.45 ± 12.52) seconds, t = 6.580, 3.215, both P < 0.05). The cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume in the observation group were (72.51 ± 21.35) mL/100 mg and (95.36 ± 31.25) mL/100 mg, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the control group [(62.42 ± 19.35) mL/100 mg, (84.20 ± 28.05) mL/100 mg, t = 2.712, 2.243, both P < 0.05). After treatment, the proportion of CD 8+ cells in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group [(25.37 ± 3.73)% vs. (27.42 ± 3.25)%, t = 4.261, P < 0.05]. The proportions of CD 3+, CD 4+, CD 3-CD 16+CD 56+ cells in the observation group were (56.32 ± 6.57)%, (34.69 ± 3.44)%, (13.34 ± 3.75)%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the control group [(53.32 ± 4.05)%, (31.69 ± 3.72)%, (11.28 ± 3.06)%, t = 5.395, 3.694, 4.179, P < 0.05]. After treatment, the scores of all dimensions of Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). Conclusion:Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase is superior to intravenous thrombolysis with urokinase in the treatment of cerebral infarction because it can better improve immune function and quality of life.