Effect of different withdrawal sequences on quality of recovery in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery under combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2021.06.017
- VernacularTitle:不同停药顺序对鼻内镜手术静吸复合麻醉患者苏醒质量的影响
- Author:
Mingjie HAN
1
;
Limei WU
Author Information
1. 厦门大学附属第一医院麻醉科 361001
- Keywords:
Anesthesia,intravenous;
Anesthesia,inhalation;
Anesthetics,combined;
Endoscopic sinus surgery;
Withdrawal sequence;
Delayed emergence from anesthesia;
Recov
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2021;28(6):881-885
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effect of two different withdrawal sequences on the quality of recovery in patients undergoing nasal endoscopic surgery under combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia.Methods:Seventy patients scheduled for endoscopic sinus surgery in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, China from January to June 2019 were included in this study and randomly assigned to undergo intravenous anesthesia alone (Group A, n = 35) or combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia (Group B, n = 35). Propofol 2-4 mg/kg, fentanyl 3-4 μg/kg, cisatracurium besylate 0.2 mg/kg were used to induce anesthesia. Propofol 4-6 mg/kg/h, remifentanil 6.5-13.0 mg/kg/h, sevoflurane ≥ 0.30 minimum alveolar concentration were used to maintain anesthesia. At 30 minutes before the end of surgery, inhalational sevoflurane administration and pump propofol administration were stopped in the groups A and B respectively. At 10 minutes before the end of surgery, pump propofol administration and inhalational sevoflurane administration were stopped in the groups A and B respectively. At the end of surgery, pump remifentanil administration was stopped in both groups A and B. The time to spontaneous breathing recovery, the time to consciousness recovery, and the time to tracheal extubation were recorded. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded at the time of entering the operation room (T0), at the end of anesthesia (T1), at the time of spontaneous breathing recovery (T2), consciousness recovery (T3) and tracheal extubation (T4), 5 minutes (T5) and 10 minutes after tracheal extubation (T6). Agitation score was recorded at T2-T6 and at 20 minutes after tracheal extubation (T7). Cough score was recorded at T4. Results:The time to spontaneous breathing recovery, the time to consciousness recovery, and the time to tracheal extubation in group A were (16.0 ± 4.6) minutes, (18.0 ± 5.3) minutes, (19.0 ± 5.5) minutes, respectively, which were significantly longer than (8.8 ± 3.5) minutes, (9.5 ± 4.1) minutes, (10.7 ± 4.5) minutes, respectively in the group B ( t = 9.554, 8.881, 9.011, all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in mean arterial pressure and heart rate recorded at T0-T6 between groups A and B (all P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in agitation score measured at T3-T6 between groups A and B (all P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in cough score recorded at T4 between groups A and B ( P > 0.05). Conclusion:Two different withdrawal sequences can maintain stable hemodynamics and reduce agitation during recovery period and cough during extubation. The recovery time of remifentanil combined with propofol is longer than that of remifentanil combined with sevoflurane.
